Selfish is fine. I'm not saying that I'm not selfish, I'm just saying that stats shows that you are more(*). I just used same measures I use for curators that I chose to support.
Whales use their own SP for their own profit, you are asking to use mine for your own profit.
Why would I do that?
The only reason I could see here is to help reward original, high quality content creators via curation efforts. It would be good for the platform, so it would good for me.
(*) Given that particular data set and measurement methodology.
But to give you a chance, I can setup a wise rule for you, so you could use equivalent of my 100% vote each day for a week..
Please do. Don't they say If you never ask you'll never know?..
Looking forward :)
OK, so let's play a wise.vote game! :-)
(I was going to set this earlier, but I had some troubles with wise, it's still developed so you need to have quite a lot of patience with it ;-) )
The rules are just published to the blockchain:
https://steemd.com/tx/ace57fa3980ba756894c42c841e0f18593b6cb74
Which translates to (human readable form):
https://wise.vote/@gtg/rulesets/for/@elsiekjay
You are allowed to use my up to 25% upvote for a post, up to a total 100% vote equivalent per day, as long as I have more than 80% Voting Power left. I never go below that point so that part should be easy, especially that among all rules I've set in wise, you are the only one who can make me go below 90%.
Above means that for example it is possible to use 4x 25% votes or 10x 10%
Now the more difficult part.
I would like curators to discover original, high quality content that wouldn't be found otherwise. Undiscovered authors, undervalued posts.
Such post should be older than 15 minutes for optimal curation, but no older than 2 days (48 hours). It should have less than 50 votes and less than 10 SBD potential payout at the time of voting (again: undiscovered, undervalued).
Few top voted authors are excluded.
End date is set to 4th May, 12:00 UTC, so it is a little bit more than a week, but I'm aware that you need to get familiar with voting using wise.vote. Please let the @wise-team know if you experience any issues with that.
"May the Fourth be with you!" ;-)
Hey @gtg, First of all, Thank You for the Opportunity :)
I've been familiarizing with the wise.vote website,to be honest I hadn't heard of it prior to your engagement, it's pretty cool!
I would say those are very reasonable rules you've set, doable too. The only one I find a bit off is this
There are plenty of undervalued posts that have less than 10SBD payouts but you'll find the curation trails from the curators make the vote count go way up. Like a $4 post with over 200 votes.
Here's a great example,
All in all, I will do my best in the duration granted:)
Best Wishes :)
That's the point - if there's curation trail already, then it's not undiscovered.
Making some notes from your journey would certainly help wise team to improve their project.
I've just doubled that vote limit (
50
->100
)(currently there might be some slight delays until my wise instance will catch up with current head block after maintenance - it's 2 hours late, but it should be in sync within 15-20 minutes)In sync now.
God, I was really excited about this wise.vote website @gtg, but it's been 2 days now that I haven't managed to log back in. I've reached out to the team on steemchat with no avail yet. Not sure if they have a discord channel, do they?
Any other alternative would be highly appreciated. Super productive week to ya!
El.
I'm sorry for your inconvenience, wise.vote definitely need to work on reliability. As you can see on their Steem.Chat channel I was having some serious issues while settings that delegation to you. Hopefully, the more people will use service, the more bugs will be discovered and fixed. I still believe that they can make a difference.
Seems like they are back up, so you can vote again.
I'm adding 3 more days to the end date.
(I saw first day of your votes, job well done!)
Yes they are back! Thanks for the heads up :)
It really is a great tool, I think most don't know of it's existence.
<3
Well Noted! Thank you for being considerate.
:)
Nice @gtg. Mode: deny. Haha.
You just cost me potential revenue. Expect a lawsuit!... hahaha
ill live.
Let me know if you decide to do one of these again. I could use some of your VP. Not for myself but rather someone i owe a bit of STEEM to and definitely deserves the vote. :)