Hive

Comments

noblewitness (49)in #witness-category • 6 years ago
RE: Regarding Unvotes
Unless you're speaking for everyone who unvoted, you're not qualified to make that statement. Given that this contradicts information we've received from people on that list…
$0.03
Past Payouts $0.03
- Author $0.02
- Curators $0.01
1 1
noblewitness (49)in #witness-category • 6 years ago
RE: Regarding Unvotes
We haven't pressured anyone into changing their witness votes. Clearly, someone has done that with regards to us. If it isn't you, I'm sure you'd want to find out who is…
$0.00
0 4
noblewitness (49)in #witness-category • 6 years ago
RE: Regarding Unvotes
We haven't said that in any capacity. We've made the following claims: witness voters that were voting for noblewitness changed their vote, and, when asked, they cited…
$0.00
0 0
noblewitness (49)in #witness-category • 6 years ago
RE: Regarding Unvotes
It's not based on any assumption. As was mentioned in the post, it may not be all of the people who unvoted, but it is clearly the case that this is happening for some of…
$0.00
0 6
noblewitness (49)in #witness-category • 6 years ago
RE: Regarding Unvotes
To be fair, when mentioning "your last post" it's helpful to specify which "you" was being referenced. As for this being grandstanding of some kind or stoking the fire, a very…
$0.00
0 16
noblewitness (49)in #witness-category • 6 years ago
RE: Regarding Unvotes
We are a third party. The conversation was between Gmuxx and Aggroed. Again, once a conversation leaves the confines of two people and is shared to a third party, expectation…
$0.00
0 1
noblewitness (49)in #witness-category • 6 years ago
RE: Regarding Unvotes
Can you provide a link to the post you're referencing? Our last posts don't have many comments at all on them, aside from this one, and the last post we made involved exposing a…
$0.00
0 20
noblewitness (49)in #witness-category • 6 years ago
RE: Regarding Unvotes
I'm surprised you don't think that exposing possible coercion or undue influence against witness voters is not a worthy goal. As mentioned earlier, we had that reasoning…
$0.00
1 1
noblewitness (49)in #witness-category • 6 years ago
RE: Regarding Unvotes
Once again, our reasoning is sound and based in a common understanding that stretches back hundreds of years. The common law tradition, which is based on this common…
$0.00
0 0
noblewitness (49)in #witness-category • 6 years ago
RE: Regarding Unvotes
Given that more than one voter we've spoken to has explicitly stated that social pressure for political reasons motivated changing their vote, there is clearly more to this than…
$0.00
1 3
noblewitness (49)in #witness-category • 6 years ago
RE: Regarding Unvotes
Our rationalization is based on common-law traditions regarding whether communications made explicitly in the presence of or shared with third parties, either spontaneously or by…
$0.00
0 3
noblewitness (49)in #witness-category • 6 years ago
RE: Regarding Unvotes
As mentioned in the response to both aggro and acidyo, once information is shared to third parties, there is no longer any expectation of privacy. This is true the world over.…
$0.00
0 3
noblewitness (49)in #witness-category • 6 years ago
RE: Regarding Unvotes
Thank you for taking the time to reply to this post. As was mentioned earlier in a reply to acidyo's post, once collusion to pressure voters is introduced as a possibility, it…
$0.00
1 0
noblewitness (49)in #witness-category • 6 years ago
RE: Regarding Unvotes
Once you release information to any group, your control over that information is moot. There's nothing dishonest about this. You're welcome to look up the laws concerning…
$0.00
0 15
noblewitness (49)in #witness-category • 6 years ago
RE: Regarding Unvotes
Once the information was shared outside of the conversation between Aggroed and Gmuxx, that information was shared with the public. While the original sharing of information was…
$0.00
0 5
noblewitness (49)in #witness-category • 6 years ago
RE: Regarding Unvotes
Well we appreciate you clarifying your position. As was mentioned in the post, given that other voters have cited this as a reason, it tends to cast doubt on the reasoning…
$0.00
0 0
noblewitness (49)in #witness-category • 6 years ago
RE: Regarding Unvotes
Permission was given by both parties to both parties to share the text of the conversation, provided it was shared verbatim.
$0.00
0 7
noblewitness (49)in #witness-category • 6 years ago
RE: NOBLEWITNESS UPDATE - On Promises, Contracts, and Integrity
That's not relevant to anything. Why can't you honor a contract you made with another party? You're a professional, correct? Surely you understand the importance of honoring…
$0.00
0 5
noblewitness (49)in #witness-category • 6 years ago
RE: NOBLEWITNESS UPDATE - On Promises, Contracts, and Integrity
I'm surprised you didn't even try to muster a defense. So far, all you've said was "well I broke the contract because I found another buyer after I already agreed to sell it to…
$0.14
Past Payouts $0.14
- Author $0.12
- Curators $0.03
2 2
noblewitness (49)in #witness-category • 6 years ago
RE: NOBLEWITNESS UPDATE - On Promises, Contracts, and Integrity
Says the man who violated his own contractual obligations because he had "no interest in waiting for pennies every week." I didn't know that was a valid excuse to violate a contract.
$0.00
0 0