Ya I know what a strawman is. Presumably I was trying to make a point, ya. (my point though was just that you didn't have one, that you were barking at something nobody had claimed.)
I don't know what a neo-anarchist is, that one I would need explained.
if you can't digest that someone can be an anarchist and not hold the state responsible for the ills of society then i can't help you.
His whole argument is based on this premise. a neoanarchist thinks that an anarchist is a product of rebellion against the state.
do i seriously need to chew the obvious?