only math and logic can be proven. Scientific theories can only be validated to be repeatable or shown to be consistent within limits and assumptions.
The assumption that has been invalidated was instruments are on "solid ground" - as in "not moving" in absolute terms, and it was not valid.
"approve" I think you mean. And yes he simply stated accept or reject. Nothing stated about "proof"
which is what I said.
only math and logic can be proven. Scientific theories can only be validated to be repeatable or shown to be consistent within limits and assumptions.
The assumption that has been invalidated was instruments are on "solid ground" - as in "not moving" in absolute terms, and it was not valid.