Nice to see you are bringing this back! I feel it is a shame you did not want to talk to us at all about why we downvoted it as they were the only posts we every downvoted! We love cinema and film, however it was difficult seeing a "Engagement" post where comments are not being engaged with day after day because then it looks like spam! However if you are going to be engaging people talking about cinema with some good themes to chat about this time then it will be awesome to have you back.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I saw your downvotes. Those articles were spammy. Sometimes people DV and they don't have time to a long explanation. @cinetalkies did you reach out to them? These guys don't maliciously downvote. Engagement is critical on either side.
Thanks bro not they didn’t reach out but will just leave them to do their thing! We never down voted on anything before but we’re finding it frustrating! Did not really think about the reaction! However if they want to actually talk about films we more than happy to chat
Posted using Dapplr
We shouldn't have to worry about the reaction. I could understand the reaction if they reached out and you were rude, but that never happened. Anyway, talking about films is cool especially if it isn't spammy.
Yes we love films! Problem is when I go on Cine my watch list is getting longer and longer!
It's a slippery slope between spam and original content. Engagement is original, but so should the article's content. I'll be getting into this area soon enough on POB and VYB.
Template articles provide nearly identical structure in each article. A problem comes in to play when the content is also essentially identical. There's nothing new or original to present to the community. I would recommend at least 50%/50% original content and recycled content.
Sure. Hit me up. I just talked to coffeelovers. I'm heading to bed though so I'll catch you tomorrow?