Part 4/7:
While South Carolina managed to shoot 36% from the floor, their overall game performance was undermined by their shooting from two-point range, which stood at a mere 26%. In stark comparison, UCLA capitalized on their opportunities, emphasizing a strategic dependence on the three-point shot. The Bruins' ability to shoot more three-pointers while hitting them at a higher percentage proved critical to their success.
As the game unfolded, South Carolina struggled to regain their footing, frequently falling behind by substantial margins. Their attempts to claw back only resulted in brief periods of lowered deficits before UCLA responded effectively, maintaining their commanding lead.