I didn't phrase it properly. I meant how did the witnesses reach that consensus because some could have said they prefer 19% or 21%. Anyway I understand the main gist of it :)
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I didn't phrase it properly. I meant how did the witnesses reach that consensus because some could have said they prefer 19% or 21%. Anyway I understand the main gist of it :)
My guess is because that was what UST was paying through Anchor. I have no hard facts to cite but my view is they looked to match that, which subsequently dropped.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta