your strategy is excellent but it fails to take into account a very important point... Infrastructure... Hive doesn't have the structural conditions to host the onboarding of even 30,000 people, let alone a streamer audience with millions of viewers.
Imagine paying that kind of money for a streamer and when he's onboarding, the front-ends just give errors and crash all the time. Then he goes to explain about a second layer token and the hive engine nodes are down and inaccessible...
DHF's money should be spent on development, not marketing... without development you can bring in millions of people and all of them will become inactive over time, leaving only the web3 degens...
Once you have a good infrastructure, then you can talk about spending the community's fortunes on marketing.
Of course, there are exceptions, such as games that bring money into Hive and use their own infrastructure to help where Hive still fails today.
Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
Well, I don't know good enough that part. I just see, they spend a lot more for different kind of marketing, ads without result - and this was my MAIN POINT. Nothing goes for online marketing. I just thought, it can't crash because of few thousands sign-ups within 10-15 minutes.
Mentioned several times here and there, it's a shame Hive doesn't have a 'welcome page', also the unnecessary several front-ends and why DAO financing their operational cost.
I also don't understand, why they don't fund new projects on Hive. And many other things.
I just got educated, who, how, why moving things around in the background, so now I know, it just goes how it has to. + I underderstand why outsider crypto guys put Hive in the 'zombie-chain' category. Too bad, I've found it out too late...
It seems to me that you don't really understand how decentralization works since most of the complaints I see come from decentralization, which is Hive's main feature...
It's worth remembering that the crypto space is essentially an ideological space above anything else. And Hive has a lot to say in this regard, and obviously it loses out in many ways to other centralized blockchains that are focused solely on making a profit for the companies that are on it...
A decentralized scenario brings countless opportunities, but with them countless difficulties as well, and Hive is the most decentralized network today
I understand the decentralization. What I see on Hive, in practice, is not that. The DAO itself is not decentralized, with it's less than 20% proposal approval rate. How I see, this is the reason why so many front-ends exist, it can feed the few, basically by doing nothing progressive.
I see, here the few use the 'decentralized' word the same how our 'leaders' use the 'democratic' word. Pretty much everybody with a bit common sense see, the democracy doesn't exist at all, but a good curtain to cover reality.
So, since it's not decentralized in practice, the few are in the charge (not elected 'leaders', not even those elected, who do marketing - nor have any relevant knowledge -, they just simply make the decisions by money, and they setup the approval rate at so low, that each group of interests could get what they want). If they can adapt these kind of governance from real world, they could even adapt more.
Currently, in practice, I see it as a totalitarian corporate communist-fascist system here, very far from decentralization.
A system like this never will attract investors, developers, other projects, when it does, these guys will scream for another fork, how they did it in the past.
This 'system' is pretty much equal with our current real world one, ain't no different, no matter what fancy words, ideas they push to cover reality.