I wonder how much you would agree that four (4) is the magic number when it comes to a (software) project team. π€ Those four would typically (but not necessarily) be comprised of programmer, designer/artist, documenter/communicator, and tester. π€π
!DIY
!INDEED
Well, 4 does seem like a good number, not too big or small, and if each filled an important role, then perhaps it would even be ideal, though I will say that redundancy is a very good thing too, in case one of the four is not able to perform their duties. πππβ¨π€
DIY
!INDEED
They say that if the "magic number" of team members (which is 4) get reduced, then each member is (much) more likely to get overloaded with tasks, while if the number is increased, then communication and portioning of tasks between the members become more complicated. π€π€―π€
Of course, each team member should also understand what each other member is doing in the team. π€π
!DIY
!INDEED
Oh the conundrum of creating a project management team! While it would hold true for a team of any number, having one place where team members check and communicate every day is even more important for teams beyond 5 members.
Understanding what the other members do is different from being able to do what the other members do, and there should be an equal portion of both I'd say. πππβ¨π€
!DIY
!INDEED
You can query your personal balance by
!DIYSTATS
(11/25)
@tydynrain! @savvytester Totally agrees with your content! so I just sent 1 IDD to your account on behalf of @savvytester.
You can query your personal balance by
!DIYSTATS
(7/100)
@savvytester! @tydynrain Totally agrees with your content! so I just sent 1 IDD to your account on behalf of @tydynrain.