I think what I mean is on Hive (and before Steem) we have really gotten used to the term 'good content' and reward that. Of course good content should be rewarded! Don't get me wrong. But I think sometimes a simple post from a good Hiver could get a lower but still significant vote from time to time too. Especially autovotes (as they don't read the posts anyway) could put 1$ votes on people that are trying hard to make something on Hive, like growing communities. Sometimes those posts are not 'great reads' but they are worth something in other ways. That's what I mean by 'reward good Hivers' - and I don't mean that we don't need to reward good content, just that we don't need to 'exclusively' reward good content.
Hope it makes sense now :-) Thanks for discussing!
Yes, it makes a lot of sense now. Thanks for clarifying. 😀