i have a problem now in tact, it started with my comments on writer of age. he downvoted each of my thoughtful comments, in my own w/(h) rig ht (h) in (d) g e. no conversation, just down voting. didn't know who was doing it, so contacted ned, then contacted witnesses, and 3 witnesses down voted me further, without investigating. just following the dud-e- they deferred t-heir- e/n- t- 0/0-t-he-ad- ew/e- d-
what is your right to down grade my expression, based on not actually investigating the person before you even d . jack-t-ass-(k-t-) a-ye- (a-) t- ass- (k-) t- a- r- e- d/d- he-ye- (a-) t- u- b- Lack- t- a- p- ass- (k-) t- greenstar, lukestokes, quochuy, samuel douglas THESE ARE YOUR WITNESSES PAID TO KEEP JACK-T-ASS-K- T- A-BE-AD-0F-T- H-C- 0/M-P- (L-) E- A- T- (B-) U/N- E/E- (D-) K- T- HIE-VEN-D-E/B-T- A- RE- D- E/B- T- ASS- (N-) E/E- K- T- https://www.facebook.com/Xubrnt/photos/rpp.468230276541922/1862039327161003/?type=3&theater
YOU ARE NOT ACTUALLY investigating the person before you tu b e/e n (d) ea.r (t/h) d your witnesses are jack-t-ass-(k-) tu-b- Lack-t-
writer of age, on steemit downvoted me for using my eyes and applying 0/d e/b t 0 w/h 0/d (0) be (a)d 0ff r0m e'ye (i.d.) s i'd e s : my comment does not deserve a down vote, it is thoughtfull, further more, woa, writer of age, didn't leave a comment. https://www.facebook.com/Xubrnt/photos/rpp.468230276541922/1862061657158770/?type=3&theater
"writer- t- 0ff- ag- e- " downvoted my every comment. i think these are working worthy comments. in contrast to what he is down voting, his bed desire is imbecility e-a-t- 0/0-t- he- t- iLL- (e-) D- his fiction is only -e- s- (m-) a- id- to look and to s-t-(e-) aLL-(h-)d- e/b- t- ass- (k-) tu-be- t- (h-) a- w/-a-r-e-d- t-he-t- can only keep his masculinity and desire and "creative capacity" if he isn't really lending 0 value w/e i.d. e/b t ass (k) t a r(h) e a.d. but you do understand the dunder -e-d-0f-t- preference for his-t-debt- 0-s/s- (0-)t- is so he can keep going in self -congratulate-d mediocrity , with no interference he would lent inn ye (a) t. why ? b.c. his fake face- d- and e-g-(u-) e- s/s- t- u- re- d- needs red character reference to all-a- w/-he-ye- (a-) t- 0ff- t- 0/0-t-he-re- (d-0-) f-ace-d- he is using women as the "men-d" he doesn't give an honest fuck in life, and doesn't want a buck t 0ff 0'r (e'ye) i/t . i am saying, his creativity is soundly resting on squatting on w(h) 0/m e/n d (0ff) at e sustainable ad e/b t 0/0 t/h f ace (t/h) a.d. e ve (in)n (d) ate . so you understand why he down votes me, it is to maintain his fiction-nail-lend- e/b-t-ass- (k-) tu-be-d- be wise women
You're bad. You have been flagged.