One of my major hangups with this idea is the concept of influencing behavior based off of the status quo of what good behavior is. This is where we start to hit the grey areas because one person's definition of good may be much different from another's.
I absolutely understand with and agree with you that everyone will disagree. I've attempted to explain my solution for that by allowing a liquid vote on both what any arbitrary individual feels is the enumeration for both the positive attributes, the positive actions, and the attribute makeup of the action. I'll be sure to do a more thorough job explaining that in future posts. Thanks for pointing that out.