The terms are in the message chain, I'm sorry you are unwilling to read, but everyone can see truth... I already chose the subject when your lies irritated me, and before you tried to look like a hero by fake offering me the then redundant choice of subjects. Again, sorry you are too lazy to read it...
It is you who is worming.
Just like how you just ignored the most basic rebuttal to your lies about the Talmud. Pages only have 2 sides, not 3. There is no "c..." Are you too proud to even accept this simplest rebuttal to your false claim? I doubt you'll accept it it since you've already ignored it once. As well as your seemingly wanting to believe the lies spread about Jews. (As per you past ignoring of my rebuttals.)
LOL you're right about one thing! The truth is out there as you have keep referring to mysterious TERMS while writing much except your TERMS :)
What more could anyone want, in an unedited online debate with power of topics @contextualize???
Do you really think you're fooling anyone??? Seems more like you're just trying to fool yourself
The truth is there. Just like pages in the Talmud (or any book for that matter) have only 2 sides, except in your world, where they can have 3, filled with a whole bunch of made up quotes!!!
Does "Yalkut 245c" exist @lecrazycanuckeh? Gonna double down? Or just ignore my rebuttal, AGAIN, for the third time?!!!
LMAO @contextualize you previously had accepted an online, unedited debate between us on Skype or Qallout, in which I had offered you total control of topic choices, but when asked for a good time for you, you no longer want to debate and keep referring to some mysterious TERMS that you refuse to mention!
Surely you can understand that this makes you look scared of defending your own stances, because no doubt you know! YOU don't have a leg to stand on in an open and fair debate!
Can we just agree on how pathetic that makes you appear???
Too lazy to go find and read the terms?
Too proud to admit there is no side c of any page in the whole world? (Third time you've ignored this rebuttal.) Make it 4?
LMAO @contextualize you previously had accepted an online, unedited debate between us on Skype or Qallout, in which I had offered you total control of topic choices, but when asked for a good time for you, you no longer want to debate and keep referring to some mysterious TERMS that you refuse to mention!
Surely you can understand that this makes you look scared of defending your own stances, because no doubt you know! YOU don't have a leg to stand on in an open and fair debate!
Can we just agree on how pathetic that makes you appear???
That's 4 times. And now you're spamming your own post, with the same comment multiple times, lol.
Go on, make it 5 times that you'll ignore that no pages in the world, let alone the Talmud, have a side "c..." Your claim is a lie.
Can't we just agree that you're too lazy to read properly? And that everyone can see my terms on your post?
LMAO @contextualize you previously had accepted an online, unedited debate between us on Skype or Qallout, in which I had offered you total control of topic choices, but when asked for a good time for you, you no longer want to debate and keep referring to some mysterious TERMS that you refuse to mention!
Surely you can understand that this makes you look scared of defending your own stances, because no doubt you know! YOU don't have a leg to stand on in an open and fair debate!
Can we just agree on how pathetic that makes you appear???