The truth is there. Just like pages in the Talmud (or any book for that matter) have only 2 sides, except in your world, where they can have 3, filled with a whole bunch of made up quotes!!!
Does "Yalkut 245c" exist @lecrazycanuckeh? Gonna double down? Or just ignore my rebuttal, AGAIN, for the third time?!!!
LMAO @contextualize you previously had accepted an online, unedited debate between us on Skype or Qallout, in which I had offered you total control of topic choices, but when asked for a good time for you, you no longer want to debate and keep referring to some mysterious TERMS that you refuse to mention!
Surely you can understand that this makes you look scared of defending your own stances, because no doubt you know! YOU don't have a leg to stand on in an open and fair debate!
Can we just agree on how pathetic that makes you appear???
Too lazy to go find and read the terms?
Too proud to admit there is no side c of any page in the whole world? (Third time you've ignored this rebuttal.) Make it 4?
LMAO @contextualize you previously had accepted an online, unedited debate between us on Skype or Qallout, in which I had offered you total control of topic choices, but when asked for a good time for you, you no longer want to debate and keep referring to some mysterious TERMS that you refuse to mention!
Surely you can understand that this makes you look scared of defending your own stances, because no doubt you know! YOU don't have a leg to stand on in an open and fair debate!
Can we just agree on how pathetic that makes you appear???
That's 4 times. And now you're spamming your own post, with the same comment multiple times, lol.
Go on, make it 5 times that you'll ignore that no pages in the world, let alone the Talmud, have a side "c..." Your claim is a lie.
Can't we just agree that you're too lazy to read properly? And that everyone can see my terms on your post?
LMAO @contextualize you previously had accepted an online, unedited debate between us on Skype or Qallout, in which I had offered you total control of topic choices, but when asked for a good time for you, you no longer want to debate and keep referring to some mysterious TERMS that you refuse to mention!
Surely you can understand that this makes you look scared of defending your own stances, because no doubt you know! YOU don't have a leg to stand on in an open and fair debate!
Can we just agree on how pathetic that makes you appear???
That's 5.
Go on, make it 6 times that you'll ludicrously ignore that no pages in the world, let alone the Talmud, have a side "c..."
Your claim is an outright, evil lie, that you intentionally wish to make, while ignoring that you are so obviously, so simply, wrong.
Can't we just agree that you're too lazy to read properly? And that everyone can see my terms on your post?
Why would I debate you at this point, when you won't even admit pages have only 2 sides? It's literally IQ <70 stuff...
Start by admitting your lie about so called Yalkut c, and I'll consider reopening, and restating the terms which I've already outlined and you ignore...
Pages only have 2 sides, despite your fantastic imaginings of side c...
LMAO @contextualize you previously had accepted an online, unedited debate between us on Skype or Qallout, in which I had offered you total control of topic choices, but when asked for a good time for you, you no longer want to debate and keep referring to some mysterious TERMS that you refuse to mention!
Surely you can understand that this makes you look scared of defending your own stances, because no doubt you know! YOU don't have a leg to stand on in an open and fair debate!
Can we just agree on how pathetic that makes you appear???