That's 4 times. And now you're spamming your own post, with the same comment multiple times, lol.
Go on, make it 5 times that you'll ignore that no pages in the world, let alone the Talmud, have a side "c..." Your claim is a lie.
Can't we just agree that you're too lazy to read properly? And that everyone can see my terms on your post?
LMAO @contextualize you previously had accepted an online, unedited debate between us on Skype or Qallout, in which I had offered you total control of topic choices, but when asked for a good time for you, you no longer want to debate and keep referring to some mysterious TERMS that you refuse to mention!
Surely you can understand that this makes you look scared of defending your own stances, because no doubt you know! YOU don't have a leg to stand on in an open and fair debate!
Can we just agree on how pathetic that makes you appear???
That's 5.
Go on, make it 6 times that you'll ludicrously ignore that no pages in the world, let alone the Talmud, have a side "c..."
Your claim is an outright, evil lie, that you intentionally wish to make, while ignoring that you are so obviously, so simply, wrong.
Can't we just agree that you're too lazy to read properly? And that everyone can see my terms on your post?
Why would I debate you at this point, when you won't even admit pages have only 2 sides? It's literally IQ <70 stuff...
Start by admitting your lie about so called Yalkut c, and I'll consider reopening, and restating the terms which I've already outlined and you ignore...
Pages only have 2 sides, despite your fantastic imaginings of side c...
LMAO @contextualize you previously had accepted an online, unedited debate between us on Skype or Qallout, in which I had offered you total control of topic choices, but when asked for a good time for you, you no longer want to debate and keep referring to some mysterious TERMS that you refuse to mention!
Surely you can understand that this makes you look scared of defending your own stances, because no doubt you know! YOU don't have a leg to stand on in an open and fair debate!
Can we just agree on how pathetic that makes you appear???
Go on, make it 9 times (including all the other places) that you'll ignore that no pages in the world, let alone the Talmud, have a side "c..."
Your claim is an outright, evil lie, that you intentionally wish to make, while ignoring that you are so obviously, so simply, wrong.
Can't we just agree that you're too lazy to read properly? And that everyone can see my terms on your post?
Why would I debate you at this point, when you won't even admit pages have only 2 sides? It's literally IQ <70 stuff...
Start by admitting your lie about so called side c, and I'll consider reopening, and restating the terms, which I've already clearly given on your post, and which you ignore.
Pages only have 2 sides, despite your fantastic imaginings of side c...
LMAO @contextualize you previously had accepted an online, unedited debate between us on Skype or Qallout, in which I had offered you total control of topic choices, but when asked for a good time for you, you no longer want to debate and keep referring to some mysterious TERMS that you refuse to mention!
Surely you can understand that this makes you look scared of defending your own stances, because no doubt you know! YOU don't have a leg to stand on in an open and fair debate!
Can we just agree on how pathetic that makes you appear???
See, you just want to hurt/irritate/troll people, hence your harassment by spam and slander, on multiple posts, using the same message.
Go on, make it 12 times (including all the other places) that you'll ignore that no pages in the world, let alone the Talmud, have a side "c..."
Your claim is an outright, evil lie, that you intentionally wish to make, while ignoring that you are so obviously, so simply, wrong.
Can't we just agree that you're too lazy to read properly? And that everyone can see my terms on your post?
Why would I debate you at this point, when you won't even admit pages have only 2 sides? It's literally IQ <70 stuff...
Start by admitting your lie about so called side c, and I'll consider reopening, and restating the terms, which I've already clearly given on your post, and which you ignore.
Pages only have, and will only ever have, 2 sides, despite your fantastic imaginings of side c...
LMAO @contextualize you previously had accepted an online, unedited debate between us on Skype or Qallout, in which I had offered you total control of topic choices, but when asked for a good time for you, you no longer want to debate and keep referring to some mysterious TERMS that you refuse to mention!
Surely you can understand that this makes you look scared of defending your own stances, because no doubt you know! YOU don't have a leg to stand on in an open and fair debate!
Can we just agree on how pathetic that makes you appear???