BLAH BLAH BLAH it's just rinse and repeat with you isn't it @contextualize! You say okay to public online debate, I share how to get in touch and say you can bring your Berkeley argument and you're right back to diversion tactic again being a massive (scared) hypocrite in the process LOL
Just keep making idiotic comments while voting yourself up and I'll keep taking screen shots to prove it all!
Funny how I'm the one challenging YOU to a public debate that you refuse but you're still making blatant idiotic comments about me LMAO (such a ZIO-NAZI trait)
And yes I've been up-voting my comments on your posts to counter act what you started :)
Thanks for sharing your true colors and you may look forward to my Steemit exclusive on you tomorrow
BTW takes a person with no morals and no shame to tell others they can't "debate properly" while avoiding a debate! (not moronic at all :)
LOL! You evidently don't intend a proper debate... You started a discussion about a law. I used data to prove your interpretation wrong. So you ignore the data and rampage about other subjects, but I'm diverting... You're funny.
If I've made a couple mistakes in this "talk" with you; it's that I replied to your ego "I eat paid zionist trolls" by unveiling all your techniques in the comment, techniques like, ignore, divert, slander, and we hadn't even begun this talk yet. As well as what little sarcasm has come across.
How does upvoting your silly comments on my posts; "nice one" etc, counteract the upvoting of my comments here?
I accepted your debate and gave terms, why after the fact, insist twice now, that I've refused? Is that some form of lie? What purpose does the claim now serve? So in fact it is you who has refused to debate, both here by avoiding virtually every point I've made, and live, by avoiding responding to my offer...
You still won't answer the original question either, and have diverted away from;
Is Berkeley wrong?
AGAIN you can reach me at [email protected] like YOU previously agreed @contextualize for an unedited video debate in which you can also bring your Berkeley argument!
Oh that's right you don't want to! GEEEE I wonder why lol (I'm sure others won't)
Why wont you answer my 1st question 1st? All this text, all these comments, now talk of a debate, yet you won't acknowledge the 1st argument, in the forum it was posed, relating to the article you posted, right here. It makes no sense, unless you're just trolling...
Go read my acceptance again. I offered terms, I have not reneged on anything. You refuse to counter offer though.
Terms can be discussed here. I've already proposed the 1st round, what is your counter offer?
Right! Hours challenging you to a peaceful unedited video debate to share with the public that I even told you we can discuss Berkeley among other things (anything you want) that you agreed to @contextualize but somehow I'm the one "trolling"? (good luck with that)
I wonder if it's coincidence that I gave you a heads up about having multiple Talmudic scripture that involves a chosen one being able to lay with a 3 year and a day old infidel that scared you off? Just so you know we don't need to discuss that!
If you want to discuss any further, you know how to reach me (that is my final offer)
Huh!!!? I accepted multiple times, gave terms, and am waiting for you. How can I be "scared off" and waiting for you to reply to my debate terms at the same time? It seems you are the one who is scared to even discuss terms, which I gave you immediately upon accepting the debate. I offered terms, why can't you reply? We'll email when it comes time to get each other's skype, or the need to speak privately occurs. What does email even have to do with it? Seems like you just want my email address, kinda weird... What am I supposed to do anyways, email you the terms I've already laid out here? This is crazy... What would you say regarding them if they were emailed to you?!!! Or have you established an arbitrary rule that you'll only reply in email now, after all this?
"Final offer," he says. Guess that's your way of escaping the proposal which still awaits your response... Otherwise, frankly, go ahead, make your post, include every comment, in order, and ask the people...
Still won't address point #1?
Is Berkeley wrong?
Fine, since you're obviously scared of public humiliation on an online debate @contextualize, that would be viewed by many, in which I gave you my email so we can set up a time! I'll address your "point #1" here - ANYBODY THAT HAS A CLUE OF HOW A REPUBLIC WORKS, would know Berkeley is extremely wrong!
I suggest you look up what makes a Nation a Republic one :)
Regarding the debate, everyone can see the truth; you won't negotiate the terms.
Regarding Berkeley, I do not accept your faulty syllogism as remotely close to a rebuttal to their legal opinion, nor would any legal scholar or student. If you're such a law expert, I "suggest" you don't use so many logical fallacies, as they only work on the (innocent or otherwise,) ignorant. (Oh right, that's who you're looking for...)