I'm more curious on what was actully paid and did it really sway their content at all?
They got talking points and a number of videos they needed to make.
A good portion of the questions they ask and deep dive into things brings up some very powerful things that are going on within governments and companies.
Well no. Thats not true at all. What you described is "investigative journalism". Gathering factual information about an entity, individuals, doing deep dives into documentation, etc.
That has nothing do with conspiracy theorists. Conspiracy theorists are people that conclude something is fact because a motive, thats often times made up by them, might exist. And they often keep the accusations broad because ofc, they cant accuse anyone specifically of anything due to them not knowing jack shit.
Its more of a problem of them not knowing how to think.