The Incas attribute the structures as being built by people who were "giants" with blonde hair, they have always said that they never did the construction but that isn't how it is recorded in our history books, because if it were that would expose a lot of things that are being withheld from us... did he mention the giants? Have you ever seen pictures of the giant skeletons that have been unearthed? They have even been found in Arkansas.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
This author attributes the Incan structures to a "tall Caucasian wearing a beard, long robes,, long robes, and sandals". Supposedly there was a planet-wide cataclysmic event, civilization was wiped out, then this person (or persons) came to teach local populations engineering, agriculture, mathematics, writing, and other talents needed for survival. He/they apparently were fluent in several of the local languages as well and always said they would return. The author thinks this is why it was so easy for the Spanish conquistadors to conquer them. I vaguely remember hearing of groups of remains found somewhere in America. Weren't they supposed to be something like twelve feet tall? (I found this link...https://grahamhancock.com/vieiranewman1/)
Most of the ones I have read about were in the 8 to 10 feet range in the US , I do remember reading an article about a discovery in Australia where the skeleton measured over seventeen feet.
Makes a person ask or question evolution, where were the 10 to 17 foot apes living that we evolved from?
None of it adds up and like you said, for every story there always seems to be a counter story in order to keep people spinning in circles when trying to figure things out.
That's exactly how the truth stays hidden. It's all so interesting to delve into though. This author, Graham Hancock, has been ridiculed and ostracized by mainstream academics...that tends to tell me he's onto something. ; )
Yep. I agree.