"This is my last attempt." "THE END"
LOL. Ok.
"GRAVITATIONAL MODEL DISPROVEN."
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLx10x10
Not so much 'disproven' as.....LOLOLOLOLOL
Just no.
My example was opposite directions, but the directions DON"T MATTER to the topic. The point is there are different directions of gravitational attraction and there is no cancelling out.
"Will the wind affect the leaf? YES." That's what I've been saying all along. The leaf is affected by the wind and the mountain and the planet.
But the wind doesnt cancel out the river. And the wind is unlikely to move the leaf that's in the current of the river. A leaf on a still lake, maybe/probably if the wind is strong enough. But not a leaf in a river.
Because the flow of the river is stronger than the blow of the wind. Doesn't mean the wind has no force, it jsut means the wind doesn't have enough force to move the leaf that is in the current of the river. REGARDLESS of the direction of the wind or the river.
The gravitational fields affect the leaf, and the river, and the mountain, and and. But 'affecting' the leaf doesn't necessarily mean 'moving' the leaf.
The gravity of the mountain WILL also affect the leaf, but VERY VERY INSIGNIFICANTLY so will not move the leave while it's in the river.
Google the 'Schiehallion Experiment'. They tested for and found the gravitational pull of a mountain. Did they float and orbit the mountain because it has gravitational mass? Of course not, that would be silly. Just like it would be silly for a leaf to orbit a mountatin.