@lostinthewoods Look at the image I showed you. Fossils, carbon dating and DNA all show this to be true.
All you need to do is to show where this is not the case, and we can throw evolution out.
As we haven't been able to do that even though we have mapped the relationship between a ridiculous amount of lifeforms, can you not see how extremely improbable it is for us to have constructed that chart without running into problems?
I don't understand what else you require in terms of evidence, when it is already extremely overwhelming. Every science that have been used to prove it works.
Radiocarbon dating is the period of time after which half of a given sample will have decayed. It is about 5,730 years, the oldest dates that can be reliably measured by this process date to around 50,000 years ago
You cannot carbon date something that is supposedly millions of years old.
This is true.
We have found dinosaur bones with live tissue in them. From millions of years ago? Does this mean we have to have to have a hard look at what we know about cell degradation? Sounds more like we need to have a hard look at how old we think dinosaurs are. Here is a video that you might find interesting.
Dear @lostinthewoods,
You should post comment with the video and address it:
Dear @jwamshop