Well that is a very positive perspective, LOL. Although I can't prove you are wrong.
What is your assessment of why mgmt is not working to fix the cluster f, in a more open and apparently urgent manner?
Dan bailed and left the cluster behind for others to manage. But Ned is apparently still around.
Do you believe there is work in progress to provide changes and fixes on urgent basis? If yes, why isn't this more visible to the community?
If you are not confident on the current mgmt team, why stay around? Maybe just out of interest to see how the experiment turns out?
Good points Dave!
Steemit inc. makes this website. Their involvement with how steem (the blockchain) evolves is separated.
All in all the self voting thing is not really a problem to be addressed at all. In fact, there are very few glaring things to change, apart from designing a system entirely differently.
I am confident that steem will continue to evolve and prosper. I am certainly interested in anyone doing things differently. See Akasha.
I have just checked https://busy.org
I like it.
I am surprised that it did not get enough attention yet.