@rok-sivante As lame as it is, I believe it is intentional and not a glitch. @creatr has lamented this before, several months earlier. I'm not sure if Steemit, Inc. made the decision in order to make the site somehow run smoother/faster or if they think 1 year old+ posts are "irrelevant."
Either way, I would like to see this addressed. Part of the blockchain's point for me is that the content is always preserved and accessible, so why would you build a front end that manually expires it? There are still so many issues with mainline 'Steemit.com' that are barriers to wider adoption.
Yeah. Kinda sad that stuff like this hasn’t been addressed and fixed in the two years we’ve been building, though guess it is what it is for the time being...