I know that writing reports will demand you more work as a curator, but:
- there is not that many of these posts (voted with a strength larger than 65%) currently;
- you will get upvotes for the reports;
- reports do not have to be 1000 words long but could be something short (like a bullet list with 2-3 items; to be discussed);
- there is a demand from the community.
Taking these three things into account, is it really a 'strict no'?
I'm the never say no type of guy, especially to objective things of this nature :)
Will these reports come as a post of its own, or as a comment under the curated post?
As comments. In the aim of potientially triggering some discussions.
To add to this question, @lemouth, if the reports are made as posts, what's the minimum number of posts that curators and HMs are required to compile in each report? Should a single post be written on by more than a single curator/HM?
I was thinking about asking this question, since I had my doubts. Shall we write a report? that report must be sent first to the private channel for a later evaluation, after approving if the publications deserve or do not admit more than 50%, we must publish a post in steemit about our evaluation?
If so, it should be a weekly post supplying all the information about those standard publications, and this apart from the weekly report that we normally make each community
Those are details we have not even discussed yet, but basically the report should be a comment to be posted under the post. Nothing more nothing less. A script will take care of the rest.
ok I understand thank you for clarifying my doubt
Not as posts. Never.
Ok, that's doable then :D