Probably because I unvoted them since the systematic voting on some accounts. I am now more motivated to conduct social network analysis to discover team voting groups. Here are the data what made me unvote them.
| Count | complexring | kushed | steemed | itsascam | steemroller | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| @aizensou | 5 | 9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 32 |
| @b0y2k | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 16 |
| @gangsta | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 16 |
| @honeyscribe | 16 | 64 | 16 | 17 | 17 | 130 |
| @jamielefay | 7 | 8 | 19 | 20 | 20 | 74 |
| @lifeisawesome | 20 | 110 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 190 |
| @livingthedream | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 32 |
| @msgivings | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 45 |
| @ozchartart | 21 | 24 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 87 |
| @richman | 4 | 16 | 5 | 9 | 5 | 39 |
| @sascha | 10 | 11 | 9 | 6 | 9 | 661 |
| Total | 107 | 264 | 110 | 113 | 112 | 1322 |
| Payout | complexring | kushed | steemed | itsascam | steemroller | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| @aizensou | 302 | 247 | 830 | 792 | 93 | 2264 |
| @b0y2k | 92 | 103 | 367 | 351 | 41 | 954 |
| @gangsta | 93 | 65 | 218 | 207 | 24 | 607 |
| @honeyscribe | 773 | 778 | 1894 | 1963 | 231 | 5639 |
| @jamielefay | 346 | 259 | 2428 | 2428 | 286 | 5747 |
| @lifeisawesome | 1108 | 1173 | 2856 | 2748 | 324 | 8209 |
| @livingthedream | 224 | 177 | 499 | 476 | 56 | 1432 |
| @msgivings | 725 | 539 | 1839 | 1781 | 210 | 5094 |
| @ozchartart | 924 | 797 | 1681 | 1613 | 190 | 5205 |
| @richman | 150 | 185 | 470 | 2127 | 53 | 2985 |
| @sascha | 845 | 658 | 2207 | 549 | 251 | 4510 |
| Total | 5582 | 4981 | 15289 | 15035 | 1759 | 42646 |
Edit: I don't want to blame people got voted here. They really added value. But some of them got suspected by the community and I need to clarify,
Good job, you mapped out a social network. You'd only be the 1 millionth person to do such a thing. Can you find the bitshares/steem team social network? Maybe with witness voting. Try and see if you can do it! I doubt you have the courage to report your findings.
I totally believe that you will unvote my analysis post if the post is unfavorable to you.
You must yell "clayop is witch hunting!" 😉
I will 'unvote' your post if it attacks (including by implication, or obviously selective reporting of "data") people for voting however they see fit, whether those people are me, people I like or support, or people I dislike or don't support. If you don't like their votes, vote differently. Just because you quote it and put an exclamation mark after it in a clumsy attempt to preemptively defuse the criticism with ridicule does not mean you aren't doing it. You are, and I will oppose it with my voting power.
Thanks for the promotion, buddy!
Could you mention me more often? :D