Being treated like this is absolutely maddening! I've experienced something similar offline in real life. I wonder what the solution would be - like a flag review board or something?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Being treated like this is absolutely maddening! I've experienced something similar offline in real life. I wonder what the solution would be - like a flag review board or something?
Read the Steem whitpaper, you obviously don't understand how this system works. Just like the author here.
And this responder does not understand the term beta. It also describes his actions as a problem in the white paper. Dan just didn't know of a way to deal with it YET that would not result in further gaming of the system.
man the only two problems were the voting for self and the flagging, stop nagging, read 50 pages and say you are correct like any lawyer or be right from the start and actually ACT u ALLY work for something, stop mansplaining :D :D :D :D sry the word is sadly in my dictionary :| and I laugh at it :D oh why am I here perpetuating a bullshit discussion. Update steemit, stop experimenting, get together and help out, stop causing problems and divides, it's not your fault.
PS
And please take into account the fact you are causing splashes, it's not a game, it's not a system. there are people here you are systematically gaming people ! STOP saying it's ok
Yes, that has been discussed, mentioned to @dan @dantheman in past comments, by me and others. A review of trusted members in the community, possibly voted on like witnesses. That would require criteria, and rules, like I have been asking. That's what this is trying to get at, because when I asked these irrational bully whales for how it works, they just say it works how ever they want it to work. Brilliant isn't it? We're going to get far with that attitude! Thanks for the feedback.
That's how @dan @dantheman designed and built Steem. Tough concept, eh?
Are you an anarchist, or someone who strongly dislikes rules or authoritarian commands?