When we speak of medicalization of childhood, we tend to associate the phrase with ADHD, the plague experts in the medical profession have unleashed upon today’s children. However, that’s only the tip of the iceberg and even if you don’t believe in ADHD or don’t identify your child as the disruptive type, unable to focus on homework, according to ‘experts’, your child might be affected by a myriad of medical conditions you’ve never heard of. Few people have, but don’t you worry, armies of experts are busy making up new conditions which might require your child needing professional help. Talk about learning disabilities became mainstream in the 1980s and in 2013 the term was added to the dreaded Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), under a very broad definition, so basically if a child struggles with something - be it in school or some developmental milestone - that child can be said to have a mental disorder.
Let’s assume you have a wonderful little boy, who likes to read, has no problem learning a poem and is good at math. You’re probably very proud of your little boy and don’t think much about him not being very good at catching ball. That only goes to show you’re not quite educated and possibly neglecting the boy’s medical problem. OK, maybe 50 years ago we used to put it down to the kid not being good at sports, but in the 21st century we know that’s a sign of dyspraxia and with adequate professional help the child could overcome his disability.
I walked into this subject after reading a thread about a child being bullied in school because of his dyslexia. That’s easy, I’ve heard of that one. But, if you look up ‘learning difficulties’, you’ll enter a minefield, full of very nuanced so-called conditions, that can be used to diagnose virtually every child with a problem.
As my son heard me laughing out loud as I was reading about ‘symptoms and warning signs’, he came over to see what’s so funny. He quickly read the page on my screen, which put my mind at ease - at least he’s not dyslexic. Judging by the ease with which he can add up how much three bags of chips would cost, I know he doesn’t have dyscalculia either. And yet, I’m not so sure about dyspraxia - which refers to problems involving different types of movement.
From the example above, the one with catching ball, you might think dyspraxia is about being clumsy, but, no, there are many sub-categories with fancy names. Going over the symptoms - from the toddler period up to high-school there’s no way you won’t find your child exhibits at least one of them - maybe he was potty trained later, maybe he’s a bit forgetful or sometimes bumps into things. You might have thought that’s just the way he is, but an expert will have no trouble making a diagnostic and putting a label on your child.
My boy, for instance, does exhibit symptoms of ‘ideomotor dyspraxia’, which has to do with ‘single-step motor tasks’ - like combing your hair or waving goodbye. Almost every time we go out, we run into the ‘comb-your-hair’ argument.I’ve always thought he was just being stubborn and using the ‘I-like-my-hair-as-it-is’ argument as an excuse. How was I to know the poor child was suffering from ‘ideomotor dyspraxia’?
Than there’s the question of ‘ideational dyspraxia’, something completely different, although I struggle to see the difference between brushing your hair and brushing your teeth - but, hey, I’m not an expert, am I? Fortunately, my child has no problem with brushing his teeth, but he does struggle with the whole ‘make your bed’ concept, also a sypmtom of ideational dyspraxia. Being such an uneducated parent, I sometimes pressure the child with my ‘mommy’s very pissed’ tone of voice, stupidly assuming he’s lazy when all the while he’s been struggling with a medical condition.
What’s even worse is that I’m probably to blame for his dyspraxia, as it can be a genetic predisposition. Basically, dyspraxia runs in the family, as none of us has ever been good at sports and we all did whatever it took to be excused from PE classes and nobody even suspected that was a medical condition.
I could go on and on about the various symptoms of various conditions or I could quote their definitions, which are mind-numbing. I guess that’s the whole point - tell an ordinary parent their child suffers from ‘oromotor dyspraxia’ and you’ll condemn them to the living hell of trying to make sense of an intricate scientifically-sounding definition, which will leave them feeling small and stupid. All the ‘papers’ on ‘learning disabilities’ sound so fancy and complicated, so full of psycho mumbo-jumbo, most parents won’t have it in them to say ‘that’s crap’.
What’s the point of coming up with made-up conditions? Well, there's money to be made, what else? Going from one professional to another for a diagnostic, taking the child to an occupational therapist or, I don’t know, the teeth-brushing expert - they all make money, don’t they?
The schools make money, too, as having pupils with ‘learning disabilities’ enables them to access special funding. And, don’t worry, Big Pharma’s in it, too, because, as the experts warn, these disabilities tend to go hand in hand with ADHD, so you might want to see an expert on that, too. As I was researching this post I could not immediately see how could ADHD medication help with all these conditions, but it does.
Take for instance a child diagnosed with dysgraphia, whose handwriting is often illegible. It’s not only that, though, - a child complaining his hand hurts the moment he has to sit down and do the homework is also dysgraphic. By complaining and moaning, the child is obviously trying to get out of the homework business and go play. This is where the ADHD medication comes in as it helps the child focus on the task at hand, popularly known as doing as he’s told and not being a bother. The senses dulled by medication, the natural sense of rebelliousness crushed, the child will try to write as best he can. Everybody wins - the parent proud of the kid’s better grades, the teacher spared of all the moaning in class, the various professionals who continuously monitor the child’s progress, Big Pharma gaining another stable customer. Well,I don’t know what the child actually wins, but who cares about children anyway?
There's a lot of irony in my post, a lot of poking fun at all this mumbo-jumbo, yet I am fully aware this is not a laughing matter. Your child struggling with shoelaces is not just a mere annoyance, the 'experts' see it as dyspraxia, which is a learning disability, which is a mental disorder. Let that sink in! Give it a few more years and the experts might force you to have that child on medication.
Thanks for reading
If you would like to support the educational community by delegating to @steemiteducation, please click on any of the following links. This will ensure that more teachers are supported on a daily basis.
100SP 200SP 300SP 400SP 500SP 750SP 1000SP 2000SP 3000SP 4000SP 5000SP 10,000SP 25,000SP
Absolutely agree with souless s.
Worthwhile to hear observations from you, thank you for that.
One little tiny thing I had. I don't see mere money as a primary motivator.
I'd rather see power, wish to control, wish to rule.
Not to say that money is unimportant, it is important. Also the motivations I named are malevolent and usually probably the 'perpetrators' would rather name some benevolent ones (care, help, justice, 'bringing order or correction' - I shudder at the last one.)
I think we're looking at two different 'layers' with different motivations. The guys at the top, the elite, yes, they're looking for control of the society and they probably hope this generation hooked on all sorts of drugs will grow up to be obedient citizens. Those who enforce the orders from above are kept motivated by money, primarily. You might be right on the desire for power even in their case, though. For my part, I'd rather go with the money as a motive. I'd rather not think of people willing to destroy a family or a child's future just because it it in their power, or I'd lose the little hope I have for mankind. (Sorry for not answering sooner!)
thank you for the reply!
I had some other discussions going on these days and was short on RCs.
Probably you are very correct with
I didn't mean that when the motive is power it always has to be accompanied with destroying future, more accompanied with (on the first sight) something benevolent. Power and the believe in "I set things right" or "I protect those children from their incompetent or evil parents". Basically being presumptous and forcing ones morals on the other, because ... ...one can. And after all, one feels those are the right morals. So why not do it?
That's maybe how their attitude is.
If you've ever seen the move summerhill
like the bureaucrats in there. Money will play there a role too but for the bureaucrat it is also something else.
I believe Marshall Rosenberg (that guy from non-violent communication) wrote about in the context of "Amtssprache", German word for like language of the officials.
Man, that escalated quickly :D.
I'm sorry.
Keep on the good fight!
Very brave post.
There are those who would willingly condemn you for it.
In my experience, some, not all, but some parents embrace having a "special needs" child, as a martyrdom of sorts.
Kids, like adults, can be extremely varied & especially complex in some aspects of their being.
I have come to be suspicious of the incessant encroachment of big pharma into children's medicine.
Just because a child has not fulfilled some arbitrary markers (which we use as diagnostic tools granted, but often forget they're tools, not definites) we assume the worst.
According to lore, apparently Einstein didn't begin to talk till around four.
Nikola Tesla (father of the modern world technologically speaking) was a frustrating loner (in both childhood & adulthood).
Where would we be, had we interfered/impeded the development of those minds with our drugs?
Anyway, well done.
You got a 18.75% upvote from @ocdb courtesy of @ladyrebecca!