From the original @msgivings post, bold is my emphasis:
There are other cases where a woman should be allowed to have an abortion. For example if she is not ready, financially, to support a child it is very unhealthy for such a lady to be forced to carry that pregnancy to term.
As for the rest, I am not going to engage in the "who is more victimized than whom" game you are setting up here. Suffice to say that if you cannot see the parallel I am making with this post, there is very little I can tell you about it, for a myriad of reasons also not worth going into.
What does money have to do with abortion?
You miss the point entirely. See previous paragraph.
I think the reason that governments impose child support on fathers is to mitigate the cost to tax payers.