No I demonstrated both. Your "other side" is irrelevant.
BTW, you can't argue for "natural rights" while devaluing the rights of others to societal privileges.
When one life depends on the other and the second acts like a parasite, the one providing life can decide for the other—especially when the second can kill at any moment kill the first.
And I can too call a child a child, that's my right, or are you telling me what to do with my own fingers on my own keyboard?
I am telling you that your perception of the unborn fetus as a child rewards my argument. You can say whatever you want. You cannot by any means dictate to others what they should do a how they can perceive a clump of cells within a host.
Yep, this is the problem alright. People who don't understand mediate rights and want to polarize the issue as much as possible. Both sides are just as bad. Thanks for playing.
Its your body. There are no "both sides are bad". Don't try to play it intellectually superior by calling everyone wrong. It's idiotic and you don't even make an argument.
If I call somebody to decide upon your health you will see how cut and clear the issue is.