Thanks for the response @abusereports - so please, could you explain what constitutes as junk? (Note I am actually being civil and trying to have a constructive discussion, not complaining or anything like that. However at the same time, guidelines are necessary).
For example - word length, improper categorisation of flags, spamming many posts, phishing, etc. There needs to be objective guidelines on what constitutes as junk. Especially, a daily flag report needs a link to that guideline, otherwise new users will always ask the same question. :-)
So please, no need to remove the down-vote, but in a civil way, can you explain to me, what objective method you used to classify it?
For me, was it about travel? - Yes
Did it describe a travel experience? - Yes
Did it give recommendations of things to do? - Yes
Are there favourable comments on it by other users? - Yes
Plus it was packaged into a story. So please, since we're all trying to make steem better, let us hear your point of view as well!
There do NOT need to be any objective guidelines, that's why we're all able to vote as we wish with our stake.
Anyway, no hard feelings @abusereports - Keep up the good work. If steem didn't have police like yourself and @grumpycat, it wouldn't be as cool. Keep up the good work!
OK @abusereports - As a stake holder, what are your subjective reasons, then? If you just didn't like it it...OK, let's go on with our lives, but keeping a community clean is all about community and discussion. The flag is about cleaning up abusive posts or spam
Note I'm actually opening a discussion.