Maybe... or maybe you are ... but my perspective is that I like his posts... and find value in his content... so if he's making a lot of money from my perspective it will be a motivation for more like content.
I could go around being upset that posts of pretty pictures and videos of somebody saying Hi I have a large YouTube following get hundreds of dollars, but I assume others like their posts.
I don't see how down voting the content providers thousands of people appreciate makes this a better site. Build the site with good content, and stop worrying about the distribution... and we will all be richer in the long run.
If you want to earn like amounts, post 10 appreciated posts a day every day for months on end while also investing (or having other invest) large amounts in the platform.
Its mainly not about the amount of money get distributed but more about the content being deceiving. People who dont understand technical analysis will fall for hia bullshit. TA just doesn't have any value on coins that have a very low market cap. He has a big following. So he has more responsibility about the things that he posts. Ethics just come in to play and if you want to promote a fraudulent person. Go ahead. But I am here to defend the naive people that may be putting money in shitcoins because of his TA.
On an ethical point of view he's just being a very toxic member of steemit. Thats why I'd flag him.
Just because simple minds are deceived by complex and complicated topic matter, doesn't mean it's unethical to teach. He does an excellent job of explain how TA is to be used, and that it should not be blindly followed. He also provides some material to help people get educated on Eliot Wave counting.
If you have a formal proof of why it doesn't work in certain situations perhaps you should post them to help out the community. But by down voting to "protect us" from his educational lectures is non sense as one of the principles of the platform is uncensored. If we want to watch content that you or anyone else approves of we can go to another site.
He is one of the most responsible analysts I've ever encountered. He goes out of his way to explain how his analysis should be applied in conjunction with ones own analysis. He choices his words very carefully and is very precise in what he says.
Thanks for defending us little guys, but no thanks... I'll decide which analyst I want to follow and listen to. Please piss off and stop flagging the content providers I follow. I'm sure there are plenty of TA or analysts that you follow that do piss poor jobs, but I'm not out flagging them.
Maybe... or maybe you are ... but my perspective is that I like his posts... and find value in his content... so if he's making a lot of money from my perspective it will be a motivation for more like content.
I could go around being upset that posts of pretty pictures and videos of somebody saying Hi I have a large YouTube following get hundreds of dollars, but I assume others like their posts.
I don't see how down voting the content providers thousands of people appreciate makes this a better site. Build the site with good content, and stop worrying about the distribution... and we will all be richer in the long run.
If you want to earn like amounts, post 10 appreciated posts a day every day for months on end while also investing (or having other invest) large amounts in the platform.
Its mainly not about the amount of money get distributed but more about the content being deceiving. People who dont understand technical analysis will fall for hia bullshit. TA just doesn't have any value on coins that have a very low market cap. He has a big following. So he has more responsibility about the things that he posts. Ethics just come in to play and if you want to promote a fraudulent person. Go ahead. But I am here to defend the naive people that may be putting money in shitcoins because of his TA.
On an ethical point of view he's just being a very toxic member of steemit. Thats why I'd flag him.
Just because simple minds are deceived by complex and complicated topic matter, doesn't mean it's unethical to teach. He does an excellent job of explain how TA is to be used, and that it should not be blindly followed. He also provides some material to help people get educated on Eliot Wave counting.
If you have a formal proof of why it doesn't work in certain situations perhaps you should post them to help out the community. But by down voting to "protect us" from his educational lectures is non sense as one of the principles of the platform is uncensored. If we want to watch content that you or anyone else approves of we can go to another site.
He is one of the most responsible analysts I've ever encountered. He goes out of his way to explain how his analysis should be applied in conjunction with ones own analysis. He choices his words very carefully and is very precise in what he says.
Thanks for defending us little guys, but no thanks... I'll decide which analyst I want to follow and listen to. Please piss off and stop flagging the content providers I follow. I'm sure there are plenty of TA or analysts that you follow that do piss poor jobs, but I'm not out flagging them.