Sort:  

You do not get my point, too bad ... A technical solution has to be enforced, not the goodwill of the people .... I do not have the solution, but what you propose is way too simplistic. We have to find the correct technical answer for people having multiple accounts. These people are invisible for now .... What do you propose about that ? That's why I was saying that if the pre HF19 solution worked, we HAVE to go back to it.

I upvoted you for having an opinion and stating it. I appreciate the fact you are reading and interacting with the site. I don't agree with exactly what you are saying, but this is for reading and participating in the conversation. I take no issue with you self-voting.

Since day 1, Steemit is always trying to solve the problem of abuse. I did get your point, and I had a point to make too. As you can see, I've given out close to $60 to people who provided good comments on this post. (who have not self--voted).
There is a group now working on a technical solution. However, there's an element to be social on a social network. Human behavior can be changed, if people see that you can actually make WAY MORE MONEY AND REPUTATION by doing good works that benefits many. Tech solutions have to work side by side with human behavioral solutions. Nothing is in a vacuum.

I did get your point. I am being a little irrational, because I read too many posts, detailing what is going on.....I appreciate you taking the time to comment and engage on this topic, and I have to agree that it's broken at the moment, but it will get fixed....if we arrive at a decent solution.

Nicely done. We may not agree on this topic, but you are good for engagement, reading and supporting many users on SteemIt. I like that you hit the hot topics and then truly engage with people of all levels.

I am not going to reward you posting a link on someone else's blog, but I did enjoy the article you linked here.