You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Whitepaper Discussion on Voting Abuse

in #abuse7 years ago

It gets into some complicated curation math, but basically if someone votes on a good post before others do, and then lots of people vote for the post after that, they earn higher curation rewards for being one of the early voters.

Sort:  

Wouldn't it be better to disable self voting?

It can't really be done. The users who are actually using it for abuse purposes would just create a second account, and upvote account 1 from account 2 to get around it.

Yes, but that would make it a bit difficult.

It is not difficult at all.

 7 years ago (edited) Reveal Comment

The formula gives more of the rewards to the users that voted earlier.

 7 years ago  Reveal Comment

It is still there. If you vote within the first 30 minutes you will share part of your curation rewards with the author.

To simplify it - if you found an amazing post that didn't have anyone voting for it, and you voted for it right at the 30 minute mark, then after that a ton more people found it and voted on it and it made it to the trending page - you would get a large amount of curation rewards.

 7 years ago  Reveal Comment

That's right. Setting aside the 30 minute rule for the moment (assume all votes are >30 minutes), curation rewards are a total of 25%. Of that 25%, earlier voters get more and later voters get less (or nothing).