"If only they would heed, it would be better for us all."
How? It would remove the incentive to fix the problem that @haejin demonstrates is in the code.
I strongly disagree, and hope @haejin never changes course as long as the code remains designed to deliver the vast majority of rewards to those accounts that already have the most money in them.
If @haejin doesn't force them to change the code so that rewards are more fairly distributed, nothing will. If @haejin backs down, the demonstration of the inequitable distribution will no longer be visible. That won't fix the code. It will simply make the inequitable distribution harder to spot.
That would reduce the pressure on Stinc and the witnesses to actually fix the problem.
I actually see that those trying to convince @haejin to make the system look like it's fair as an attempt to maintain the status quo--which is concentrating rewards at an accelerating pace in the accounts of those with the most SP, and continually shrinking the rewards shared by the minnows.
That is the bad thing for Steemit, Steem, and all the minnows.