Yesterday we got punished for telling the truth

in #abuse3 years ago

Yesterday we received downvotes from steemflagrewards on one of our comments on the wall of another account.

Comment-downvote

‘They’ even didn’t downvote one of our posts, so as to gain visibility of their downvotes on our wall.

Comment-downvotes-2

So today we want to ask one simple question – why do you protect abusers by downvoting the informative comments that expose them?

It’s even not about ‘freedom of speech’. We do not complain that someone has taken away our right to free speech.

We are here to inform about crimes. But it turns out that these crimes are welcomed and protected by the community itself.

We were aware that we would not be left to write freely about the platform's big abusers.
Because abusers support each other.
And others follow them blindly.

Who is the account that is defended in this way?


Cryptospa is a minnow with the reputation of 77, built on the base of excessive daily posting (4, even 5 times a day in the past) and the permanent support of one Orca account since the time of Steemit.

He defines himself as a ‘minnow supporter’. Yes, you read it correctly. And it’s not a lie. Because he supports himself as a minnow – this is what a “minnow supporter” means.

What do we mean?

The time of his first power down for the last year coincides with the creation of three new accounts, the one of them even “onboarded” by him – unicornis. The other two are pegasos and gryphes. These are two Dolphins and one Minnow.

Do you see any differences in them:

Comment-spam

The three accounts act in similar way, do the same things (unicornis and pegasos have even the same Binance ID) and most of all, they upvote all 4 posts of cryptospa. Every day.
They upvote also some other linked accounts of his friends and relatives like cryptoprima, mushanov, yanipetkov (who cryptospa calls ‘his brother’, but unfortunately he was caught plagiarizing and spamming a month ago).
They upvote also some other accounts who in turn upvote back the posts of cryptospa.

Isn’t that a wonderful example of circle voting?

The three accounts were also used in the beginning for comment spam and comment farming, “commenting” under the posts of cryptospa and getting his upvote.

Comment-farming2


Comment-farming3


Comment-farming

Such a wonderful addition to this classic platform milking scheme!


So, who is cryptospa – the account that has been defended by all means?


We’ll leave the answers to you and your conscience.


Let's keep Hive free of abusers, farmers, spammers and low-quality content producers!


 " " \"radioactive-pixabay.png\"""

image source

@xposd is a project of a bunch of people who care about the quality, purity and integrity of our decentralized social network.

We are not here for the rewards and they’re all declined, but everyone could support us by sending HIVE anonymously from any exchange where HIVE is listed.

All donations will be used for exposing more abusers, downvoting shit posts and comments and upvoting quality content.

Sort:  

You got downvoted for being off topic on Azircon's post.

Here's another one for spreading misinformation about "protecting abusers" and not declining rewards.

Know when it's appropriate to approach someone or stay off their posts with unrelated garbage.

You could have known why by asking in the discord: https://discord.gg/tVjRSwTG9v
Their public conversations happen there.

You have no idea what you're getting yourself into, honestly...

Hello. In today's report, you mentioned 11 accounts but you did not mention which one they are (used for tipu upvotes, self voting, etc). Please submit another, more detailed report.