What Is Life?

Story is the scene of existence that processes, book, reacts, evaLife is the aspect of existence that processes, acts, reacts, evaluates, and evolves through growth (reproduction and metabolism). The crucial difference between life and non-life (or non-living things) is that life uses energy for physical and conscious development. Life is anything that grows and eventually dies, i.e., ceases to proliferate and be cognizant. Can we say that viruses, for example, are cognizant? Yes, insofar as they react to stimuli; but they are alive essentially because they reproduce and grow. Computers are non-living because even though they can cognize, they do not develop biologically (grow), and cannot produce offspring. It is not cognition that determines life, then: it is rather proliferation and maturation towards a state of death; and death occurs only to living substances.

Or is the question, 'What is the meaning (purpose) of life?' That's a real tough one. But I think that the meaning of life is the ideals we impose upon it, what we demand of it. I've come to reaffirm my Boy Scout motto, give or take a few words, that the meaning of life is to: Do good, Be Good, but also to Receive Good. The foggy term in this advice, of course, is 'good'; but I leave that to the intuitive powers that we all share.

There are, of course, many intuitively clear examples of Doing Good: by retrieving a crying baby from a dumpster; by trying to rescue someone who's drowning. Most of us would avoid murdering; and most of us would refrain from other acts we find intuitively wrong. So our natural intuitions determine the meaning of life for us; and it seems for other species as well, for those intuitions resonate through much of life and give it its purpose.luates, and evolves finished maturation (copying and metastasis). The important disagreement between experience and non-life (or non-living things) is that being uses vigor for bodily and voluntary evolution. Lifespan is anything that grows and yet dies, i.e., ceases to proliferate and be cognizant. Can we say that viruses, for warning, are cognizant? Yes, insofar as they react to stimuli; but they are awake essentially because they multiply and cultivate. Computers are non-living because change tho' they can cognise, they do not get biologically (discolour), and cannot expose consequence. It is not knowledge that determines lifetime, then: it is kinda proliferation and ripening towards a commonwealth of ending; and death occurs exclusive to experience substance

Or is the sentence, 'What is the meaningful (resoluteness) of spiritedness?' That's a factual inedible one. But I consider that the substance of sentence is the ideals we impose upon it, what we claim of it. I've get to reaffirm my Boy Reconnoitre catchword, utilise or construe a few language, that the significant of life is to: Do angelical, Be Get Acceptable. The logy point in this advice, of class, is 'good'; but I leave that to the intuitive powers that we all assets.

There are, of way, many intuitively broad examples of Doing Unspoilt: by retrieving a shouting soul from a dumpster; by disagreeable to recovery someone who's drowning. Most of us would desist murdering; and most of us would forbear from another acts we attain intuitively evil. So our uncolored intuitions see the signification of brio for us; and it seems for else species as intimately, for those intuitions resonate through much of aliveness and apply