Failing to address points made in conversation and simply projecting your own scientism prevents actual conversation.
Go ahead and discuss this with the voices in your head, since you're not involving me and what I have said in any way whatsoever.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
"Failing to address points made in conversation and simply projecting your own scientism prevents actual conversation.
Go ahead and discuss this with the voices in your head, since you're not involving me and what I have said in any way whatsoever"
Logical fallacy. You don't make any sense. You bumped into conversation with some pointless essay enforcing some subject that you require to respond to. I have no obligation to address to some subjects that you have brought, especially because I consider it scientifically illiterate nonsense. On the other hand, you should address the topic in the conversation that was started before you bumped in.
I addressed one point in your conversation about Lancet proving that you have no clue what you are talking about and do not understand science as you do not even understand what peer review is. That's about enough.
This conversation ends here as it is cognitively unstimulating for me. I already know how it will continue to if I reply more. You will just project more and more logical fallacies.
What does that even mean?
Do enjoy the entirely private meaning of your words. No one else can, because no one else can understand what they mean, strung together seemingly arbitrarily. Perhaps someday you'll understand what logical fallacy means, rather than just throwing it around because you think it sounds cool.