Well then if it's done on a voluntary basis it would not be government anymore. It would be something like charity or a company so.
In the later replies you talk about the economic system imposed on the people, that's true now.
But there is no difference between working for money and handing it over to the slave master a.k.a. forced labor, and doing the forced labor under thread of force for "society" or "the common good" being forced by some "system of governance or management" If you choose to live under a system of governance or management that's fine but there would need to be an option of not being governed and managed.
I.m.o. even if there was no money at all people would still engage is economic behavior. To give an example if someone was living in a community and had to work there 20 hour per week to provide for the "the needs of the community" (whatever that may be) and in another community he had to work 15 hours for the "common good" people would still switch.
I see no other way for "society" ( I hate to speak for a concept) than that things happen on a voluntary basis. I fact I speak now for myself, being managed or governed is not what life is about I'm a grown up I don't need some "know it all control freaks" to make me do the right thing. Suggestion and advice is fine and I'm all for coöperation and sharing on voluntary basis......but force.......NO.
Or to say it differently; if there is consent, it's voluntary, if it's governed it's not.