Distinct differences between the capabilities of communication between a human and CGPT vs a human and a high IQ- high EQ differences were noted in my head as I read this.
- CPGT cannot utilize rhetoric beyond logos.
Perhaps since the AI itself may be constructed on a large scaffolded bed of logarithmic after logarithmic algorithm, it is an expert at mathematical philosophies and all forms of tangible logic. This follows even under the circumstances of asking for motivation, or asking more soulfully- oriented questions. It can only respond in matters of science and math.
- CPGT is not an active reasoner
Nor does it utilize communication as a form of manipulation. As within a human context- all communication is manipulation, however, due to the entirely null aspect of primitive inclinations and spirited motivations, all CPGT can do is as they say "Receive an input and give an acclimate response" (don't know if that's word for word but it's the same essentialization.
- Curiosity is entirely absent.
There's no point whatsoever during this entire conversation in which CPGT asks you a question, nor even itself. There's no begging to be understood the surface on either side of the coin. It lacks any desire entirely to neither inquire or create.
Just thought it was interesting and I needed to convince myself my career as a writer isn't entirely fucked
Congratulations @unigf! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)
Your next target is to reach 2500 upvotes.
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPCheck out our last posts:
Support the HiveBuzz project. Vote for our proposal!