That's an even worse example, when and where did they do that?
In this case, the judge seems to be considering it illegal to ADVERTISE… which is basically pre-crime.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
That's an even worse example, when and where did they do that?
In this case, the judge seems to be considering it illegal to ADVERTISE… which is basically pre-crime.
Well any time the U.S. has performed a "pre-emptive" strike they are doing so with the same mindset as pre-crime. They want to attacker an attacker before they get a chance to attack. They seem to think it's a more honorable excuse for killing people than simply being the aggressor.
Edit: Also, I don't agree... "it wasn’t intended to police what rental hosts upload to the website".