And we get to the heart of the matter,...
I know you guys got history.
Not exactly what all transpired, but you are certainly entitled to your opinion.
I think where you got off track was when you decided to force that opinion onto me.
I support nog's right to speak, too.
He may want to correct his transgressions committed against you.
He may want to add to them.
Either way, I would like to know about it.
At this point I track this story with an inconsequential upvote to his posts that normally doesn't pay out.
This vote solely serves to keep me informed of progress in the matter.
You are free to stop the rewards from changing hands, but interfering with the speech is out of bounds, to me.
I would like to see y'alls conflict resolved, that doesn't happen without communications.
So, I am merely tracking a high drama conversation.
I agree you are justified in holding your position towards nog.
I don't think you should mow down innocent bystanders.
I don't really care if you guys kiss and make up, or kill each others like dogs, but that little vote is the only way I don't space off this little dramafest.
You, of course, have to do what you do.
People upvoting threatening posts aren't bystanders. Thanks for having this conversation so I know where you're coming from. Again, poor approach by me. I've given nog multiple chances (too many) but he's proven to be a manipulative person that is permanently fucked in the head. Once I realized that, I realized he's irredeemable.
If i have to go to steampeak to see coininstant, how is nog not on the same list?
This is a person complaining about having being targeted for abuse of their currency. Then they continue said abuse because you up-vote someone retaliating.
Huh?
Exactly.
Posted using Partiko Android