It is true that if a person can not fulfill the obligations, simply return the amount that he has not worked. Otherwise, risks can be explained by any fraud. But he's not a fraud? And it's not important amount for someone small, it's justice and maintaining his good name.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
It's important if I was offering to give you back what you lost isn't it? But if you want to accuse someone of fraud maybe you get nothing instead ... it's not about his name, it was my delegation that was paying for the vote you say you lost.