You ever read about New Urbanism? I think urban planning would still be a thing, and you'd still need traffic rules and dispute resolution, which should be done by neighborhood assemblies on a consensus basis if possible. There would also be disputes over possessions, which would need to be arbitrated and basic rules and standards would be useful.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Lol, you have depth of knowledge that is rare, my friend,...
I'll look into the Wikipedia and see what startpage.com can give me.
I do see disputes arising, he said, she saids, as it were.
The panopticon will end a lot of those, but dispute resolution will be a continuing necessity.
I haven't looked at New Urbanism, do you have a link?
Not really. Google James Howard Kunstler. He used to have a podcast on the topic. I think New Urbanism compliments democratic confederalism and the "small is beautiful" ideas of E. F. Schumacher and Leopold Kohr. Also, fits in with distributism (G. K. Chesterton, Hilaire Belloc) and Georgism (Henry George). Interesting stuff.
"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex. it takes a touch of genius - and alot of courage, to move in the opposite direction" - Albert Einstein