Anarchism is about courage. It takes poise to help people escape the cult of normalcy, wherein they revel in a haze of disinterest and violence and depravity. But when anarchists attempt to persuade people to discard love of their culture coma, of blood and carnage, they usually get a counterattack in the form of dismissive slander and appeals to State piety.
But it goes without saying the aforesaid defensiveness will crop up. Anarchism is not a philosophy one can peddle and not expect backlash. Anarchists require gumption to spread their ideas. They need not hide in the basement and avoid attacks; the anarchist must eventually emerge from the basement and lay siege to the idea of Statism. They must not be too fearful to communicate, lest they become miserly in their attempts to liberate the downtrodden.(html comment removed: more)
However, the person who adopts anarchism must also consider the threats and challenges. They must fully comprehend what they are getting into. There will be push-back from all social segments, and much resistance will be vicious, childish, and sometimes violent.
But remember what Harriet Tubman said when she was trying to rescue the slaves:
"I freed a thousand slaves I could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves."Thus, anarchists must try to convince everyone of their servitude and begin moving in the direction of sovereignty, especially with regards to friends and family.
Courage in the Family Unit
As soon as anarchists utter one word about liberation of mind and body, friends and family will alienate them, ostracize them, turn them into social pariahs. They will talk about them behind their backs and perhaps excommunicate them from the clan.
So when anarchists make a stand for truth and liberty, they are de facto removing themselves from the cult of familial normalcy. They are by ideological necessity taking a stand against violent relationships and the bad ideas that circulate within family systems. They are looking in a different direction than the friends and family who blindly and idly accept evil.
Yet, this is also a good step toward infecting the family with enthusiasm for freedom, and it should not be taken for granted. Writer J.K. Rowling summed up this ability to question the friends or family. She said:
"It takes a great deal of bravery to stand up to our enemies, but just as much to stand up to our friends."If anarchists do not understand this sacrifice or they buckle under pressure from friends and family, then they may not be ideal candidates for the job. However, it is okay to remain silent in some instances and shoulder the burden of anarchism in secret. The anarchist family member must pick and choose their battles.
However, if anarchists never chat about freedom, never put themselves on the line, they will wither away and their family may never know truth. It would be a tragedy, which is why courage is the epicenter of anarchistic action. It is the melody that freedom lovers play to the hymn of bravery. And ultimately, if anarchists can get in touch with their families on this issue, the world will be better for it. When the family culture changes, global culture likewise changes. It just takes that one impulse to act without fear.
But there is an equally dire problem. Dealing with the family is not the most dangerous area of the anarchist use of courage.
The Looming Threat of Government
Anarchists must eventually challenge government sociopaths. This particular battle could give rise to violent reprisal, though. As soon as anarchists start talking negatively about the State, or challenging government agents, they may become targets. Government entities may try to use the chilling effect to quell dissent. And finally, governments may resort to violence. It is nothing new for an agent of the State to harm, cage, or harass an anarchist.
Cop Block activist Ademo Freeman can attest to this. He has been trailed to court and other places by governmental goons. One can also ask Come and Take it Texas Founder Murdoch Pizgatti about his interactions with the State, as well his friends who have been locked up for trivial "offenses." Many anarchists have had run-ins with cops, and few of these interactions ended peaceably. However, notice that these anarchists continue to do what they do. They continue to manifest courage in all of their exploits.
The Anarchist as a Prey Species; Evolving Uses of Nonviolence and Communication
Nonetheless, anarchists have historically been a prey species for bureaucrats. They are the hunted because they are the ones trying to overturn the aggressive hierarchy and create stability among the people. Thus, the courage of an anarchist ensues as absolute fearlessness. The anarchist could die in the process of being disobedient.
This is why some anarchists and libertarians have invoked the porcupine as an the image of ceaseless defense. It spines represent pinpoint protection against its natural predators, although anarchists have not yet needed to unleash a barrage of spines. They have tried to employ less lethal or painful tactics.
Modern anarchists are using peaceful interaction, nonviolent resistance, and nonviolent communication to spread truth, which involves tremendous bravery because nonviolent resistance can also get bloody.
However, it is more difficult for governments to react to this kind of dissent with violence. Historically, when governments have tried to squash nonviolent protesters and revolutionaries, that government ended up damaging its already questionable reputation. Once that happened, other regimes targeted that government out of an attempt to save the idea of Statism as a representative symbol of the people. Thus, the anarchistic ability to be steadfast and exemplary may pay off.
Escaping the Cult of Normalcy, Creating a culture of Courageousness
Anarchists must must maintain testicular fortitude. When they get the ball of dissent rolling, they will likely undergo assaults from all of those they engage, including friends, family, society, and government employees. But if they remain vigilant, people will start to see them as role models. And thus they will help people escape the cult of normalcy.
The cult of normalcy relies on passive acceptance of the status quo, which is why unflinching courage is so important for anarchists. When anarchists spread ideas, if they employ tenacity, the ideas might be more easily entertained by citizenry who are entrenched in the matrix of everyday Statism. In this sense, courage represents the cure for the various authoritarian memes being injected into society.
No doubt, when people realize the strength of their soul, they will eventually spit in the face of those who claim to be their masters---they will rebel not physically, but culturally, mentally, and emotionally. They will reject the notion that they must be meek and docile before those who insinuate themselves as parasitical entities, bent to feed off of them forever.
Therefore, this new direction of freedom through courage represents the birthright of humanity and it may eventually spur a paradigm shift, changing a culture of conformity into a culture of courageousness.
“I wanted you to see what real courage is, instead of getting the idea that courage is a man with a gun in his hand. It's when you know you're licked before you begin, but you begin anyway and see it through no matter what.---Harper Lee, To Kill a Mockingbird
Art by Banksy
Testicular fortitude granted to this post.
Haha. Thanks sir.
Love your writing, Such power and efficiency. Strong ideas.
I believe in liberty but the whole concept of anarchy is something I have not explored deeply. Would you say the goal of anarchy is liberty or simply the destruction of government and normalcy?
The goal is liberty, but the abolition of the state is necessary for us to reach that goal. That isn't to say we don't want government per se. We do want government in the sense that we pick who we let govern us by buying their service and freely associating with them. We wouldn't be forced to pay arbiters or protection agents, but rather we would choose whether or not we would buy the services and if we do buy then choose who we wish to deal with.
Sounds great. My fear is that by attempting to destroy a government that allows some degree of liberty within the bounds of societal order we would then have complete disorder and chaos which would cause the rise of an even greater governing power and a greater loss of liberty than we currently enjoy. Do you think it is possible that the governments of the world know this and therefore they have patiently and methodically planted the seeds of anarchy in the hearts of the people through the educational system, knowing that eventually the anarchists will bring down the current system? Could their hope be that the people will be so desperate that they will clamor for and even beg for a government to take control and establish order once again out of the chaos? This would result in the exact opposite effect desired by the anarchists but would play out perfectly for the governments who want complete power over the populace. It is a very difficult situation we are in. We currently do not have the level of liberty our creator intended for us to enjoy. We can either fight for the complete destruction of government and hope we win and maintain control or we fight to remove the corruption from the current system and methodically work to change government back to its core purpose which in my mind is to guarantee our liberty. Thanks for the interesting discussion. I agree that the people should have absolute control over the government. They are supposed to work for us - not the other way around.
The word anarchy and the suffix -ism, themselves derived respectively from the Greek ἀναρχία, i.e. anarchy (from ἄναρχος, anarchos, meaning "one without rulers". Used as fist principle it simply means "Dont hit, Dont steal" - once you come to grips, all issues become incredibly clear - its like having a compass to know where to go in life, simple yet very effective. Should we ban guns. abortion, gay marriage? Ask who is hitting; threatening or stealing and you know who is in the wrong.
Honestly, nobody but my friends knew that I was a libertarian (minarchist or anarchist) for about 3-ish years. I did change my dad's views here and there, but he thought I was a conservative until a few months ago when I started to more openly disagree with him. He hasn't changed his attitude towards me except when he asks me about my opinions, where instead of assuming like he use to he actually asks now. He's the person that got me into politics, but I don't see any disappointment from him that I've went a different way than what he raised me.
The rest of my family that cares about politics, however, does not know. Half of them are the ones that whenever we discuss the police it almost always gets to a yelling point. I now just try to avoid discussion with them, so I doubt that they'll know my true political identity for a while. I believe there would be some social consequences with them if they did find out, but there is no need to tell them when they believe that decreasing the funding for police at all will cause "them" or "the other side" to win.
The other half is more libertarian leaning anyways and more accepting when it comes to that kind of stuff, but I see no use in being blatantly open about it since I only see some of them 4 or 5 times a year.
Wow. That's a really unique story about your father. I am glad you were able to work with him in that way. Amazing. And I totally I understand the desire to avoid discussion with the rest of your family. It's difficult discussing these ideas with family sometimes.
As for me, I am a public figure in terms of my position, so everything is out in the open for my family. When I first started speaking up, I got a lot of backlash. But eventually, they just started ignoring me. I think, in part, most of them don't really understand anarchism. But I am working on bringing more over. It just takes time and patience, but I understand that some people do not have either one of those commodities.
Thanks again for sharing that, Nick. It was valuable.
Word up. Love & Light <3
Love and light, friend.
Speaking of courage, Sterlin, what do you think of agorism? Do you think agorists are courageous?
The hardest part for me has been being an ex-Navy guy. They don't realize that one of the reasons I've become an anarchist is BECAUSE I've been in the belly of the beast and gotten an inside look at its evil, not in spite of it. I wish I could take back my time in the Navy, but I can't. I have to live with the fact that those years are not only wasted, but they directly contributed to the oppression of others, and for that I am deeply regretful. Now, my mission is to help expose the state for what it is and to help others achieve a higher degree of consciousness and self-ownership.
Awesome article Sterlin! I just upvoted! Please upvote my recent interview. Cheers! :-)
https://steemit.com/adam/@danilo-cuellar/adam-williams-ex-wall-street-derivatives-trader-turned-entrepreneur-and-voluntaryist
Dear User known as @sterlinluxan
Steemit has a BOT problem! Your Vote Counts... Maybe
https://steemit.com/steemit/@weenis/bots-steemit-s-first-community-based-decision-on-bots-your-vote-counts-to-be-or-not-to-be-details-inside