You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Answer to a Common Critique of the Non-Aggression Principle.

in #anarchy6 years ago

The competitive private protection agencies along with other agencies seem brilliant idea despite the risks involved and the difficulty of presenting it to the average person and for me it worth trying.

But if the problem is with the corrupt governments and not with the concept of authority itself why don't we find means to correct them, Taking into consideration that the private defense firms that is going to protect you, clear your where-about, pay a fine for you, and have the ability to submit your papers to media as a dangerous individuals enjoys new kind of authority over you in such a way we don't yet fully grasp, and might also become corrupted overtime.
Frankly, I got the impression that everything is well known because of the enthusiasm and the confidence for the NAP and Anarchism you guys speak with.
Of course, You don't have to see all the way before you start but with regard to the political roller coaster my country has experienced the last 6 years I can claim that good intentions only don't guarantee success specially when you deal with well experienced state guys and machiavellian opposition.

Sort:  

Right. It’s not about “good intentions,” but the fact that slavery and theft are wrong, and should thus be abolished, regardless of logistics.

Should black slavery have remained in the US until the problem of farming and harvesting cotton was completely solved? Or should immoral acts be ended regardless?

The logistics actually are of great importance and shall be taken care of in order not to be used for a different kind of immoral acts by a different group of people who may take advantage of the good intentions of others.