Oh without a doubt. This guy is a huckster. Most annoying thing for me is that he managed to get a book out that he can keep throwing out there. He's a so-called published author.
Posted using Partiko Android
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Yeah, and the trick he pulls, is that content in the book is mostly right on. What he says, and does however, goes against it, and people cannot seem to reconcile this to the fact that he is a huckster: BUT THA BOOK IS GUD SO HE IZ GUD!!!
smh
One example, from his book:
-Adam Kokesh, Chapter 9 Section IV, FREEDOM!
Annnnnnd....he's been asking for votes pretty much since he got back from Iraq. New Mexico, then the prez thing, and now he's onto the AZ senate race. Thanks for all the money! On to the next!
Actually Adam lost his delegation from @jamesc, but now it is being channeled right back to him via @kennyskitchen, who has the JamesC delegation now. I am going to comment on that post. Feel free to back me up. I will need it. Kenny does not like me.
Kenny's post: https://steemit.com/tribesteemup/@kennyskitchen/if5y53r9
You sound like you're getting ready to head into a neighborhood controlled by a rival gang and are trying to round up a posse to defend you.
Kenny, Yes. That is how you and Luke have acted toward me. Doesn't that make you wanna step back for a second? Why would I need to feel that way? Read my response to you. I want to be at peace with you man.
I've read & replied :-)
My experience of our interaction was a bombardment of negative & aggressive energy that was mostly unrelated to me, but directed at me, to which I tried to respond calmly, got worked up myself, and promptly discontinued because I have no interest in interactions that bring that kind of energy.
Kenny, a person's beliefs matter, and defending what they believe to be right and just isn't negative and aggressive energy. How are we supposed to defend what we believe in, our ideology, without you or someone who disagrees considering it negative and aggressive energy? I am not going to stop defending my beliefs simply because they cause someone strife. Should I simply let those people continue to change definitions and mislead people (not saying you are here, but Adam has been)?
I really don't want to dive into this too much anymore. As I was attempting to communicate back when Graham & I had our conflict, the issue for me was around the way communication was happening (which we've both owned & apologized for), and the way I fetl I was being challenged for beliefs/stances/actions that were not my own.
Funny, because I felt the exact same way. Perhaps my reply to your other comment will clear things up.
As long as you're not just dismissive apropos of nothing, I think...I hope...we can be cool.
If I leaned in too hard, and dragged you into situations that were not directly related to you, consider this an apology.
Well versed you got my vote i mean support ! Sweet dealing of conflicts going on here love what
oi am reading ! I must learn more! And i will through your Information and a follower of yours of course , not to imitate but to gain knowledge and footing into the realm of voluntaryism 
I appreciate that, accept your apology, and apologize for not communicating calmly, clearly, and respectfully.
We're totally cool on my end :-)
You’ve just upvoted a comment that accused me of slander and using force. Sigh. Apprently we are not. Ah well. Keep upvoting fraudulent accounts in the name of freedom and peace, I suppose.