First off, don't patronize me.
Why do you think telling you to shut up when in my opinion you talk insanity and pollute my blog, is wanting to control you and not expressing my freedom to not be around people I do not respect for their insane views?
It's wanting to control me clearly because I have every right to voice my thoughts regardless of how insane they seem to you and telling me to shut up on a PUBLIC forum is exactly what wanting to control someone is. It's not your freedom to shut me up, you have every freedom to voice your opinions and make any demands of me, but wanting to shut me up is directly trying to control me and you can't twist it into "the freedom of I don't want to be around people like you" because you can move on any time you want but you've got no right to demand I leave a public space for your "freedom", because if you don't want to be around me then you can mosey on can't you, I'm not on your property, you don't have to respond to me, you can't stop people from responding on a public forum and expressing that kind of want is indicative of trying to control the other person.
You do not deserve a place in my life and I do not want you in it.
I never wanted or made a place in your life, understood? So stop the Bullshit insinuations.
Please let go and stop your quest for proving something that cannot be proven.
Go fuck yourself because you got no right to demand anything from me like that and I have every right to tell you to die slow to any such demands dressed up in a plea.
It is my freedom to choose.
Whatever that means it's irrelevant but I'll use it to reiterate my previous point: I chose what and who and how I respond and you don't have any right to Defame me, call me a Statist, accuse me of numerous things and ultimately slander my character. Freedom of speech is great, but you've clearly abuse it again and again and think that you have a right to tell me what I respond to. You don't, but you can die slow.
As I mentioned a few times, you are not immortal and higher form will evolve from you.
Blow it out your ass.
Do I have the right to tell you you're not allowed to talk about me or my life? No, but I have every right to tell you you can't defame me, make false accusations or drag my character through the dirt.
I consider voluntaryists to be of higher value to peaceful society, which I want. You in my opinion refuse to grow, therefore will need to extinct to make room for more evolved beings. It is nature.
I don't care what you think about me if that's wasn't clear enough, but I do care when you defame my character and make false accusations or when you wish extinction for whatever cacamaniac reason you fish out of your ass.
Weak gene dies so the improved one can thrive. It is survival of the species. I did not invent it. Call pacha mama and tell her she a dumb moron. I wish for NAP or golden rule to be the only law, which comes from nature. It is not invented and imposed on anyone. If anyone should try to impose anything on me or others, I will defend.
Except when you impose that I shut up by spamming and flagging or outright telling me to shut up, defaming me, making false accusations (false witness) and hurl your hate through "I hope you go extinct".
Other man-made laws are imposed on me until I say I do want them. If I do they are not laws anymore but rules agreed on voluntarily through consensus. You do not understand what consensus is because you think I give my consent to be governed because I do not give my consent to be governed...
I never said you gave your consent you idiot, and not only that I never talked about consensus, so stop insinuating Bullshit and definitely stop accusing me of things that ought to come with substantial evidence in their support and not make only a conjecture built upon a false accusation, in other words you monumental moron, quote me saying that I think you consent.
I am telling you I do not. You also think I give my consent when I do not say I do not want something and it is moral to do immoral things to me because I did not say I didn't want them.
It's evident to anyone with a bit of sense that if you do not object to wrongs you agree to them or allow them. Consent isn't the apt word here but here's plenty to reassure I'm not making it up, I have to give you the benefit of innocence in understanding this because you've demonstrated to be an incompetent nincompoop, a complete moron.
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1362480608089237 (for those with good comprehension)
Your silence is consent. (Plato)
Truth is not only violated by falsehood; it may be equally outraged by silence.
Silence never won rights. They are not handed down from above; they are forced by pressures from below.
As we must account for every idle word,
so must we account for every idle silence.
We will have to repent in this generation not merely for the vitriolic words and actions of the bad people, but for the appalling silence of the good people.
To sin by silence when they should protest makes cowards of men.
Silence in the face of injustice is complicity with the opressor.
Throughout history, it has been the inaction of those who could have acted; the indifference of those who should have known better; the silence of the voice of justice when it mattered most; that has made it possible for evil to triumph.
Silence encourages the tormentors, not the tormented.
If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor.
There may be times when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must never be a time when we fail to protest it.
One does not have to operate with great malice to do great harm. The absence of empathy and absence of understanding are sufficient.
The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing.
All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.
He who does not oppose evil, commands it to be done. (Da Vinci)
What you allow, you encourage.
The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing.
All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.
What you allow, you encourage.
One does not have to operate with great malice to do great harm. The absence of empathy and absence of understanding are sufficient.
I swore never to be silent whenever and wherever humans endure suffering and humiliation. We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormenter, never the tormented.
There may be times when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must never be a time when we fail to protest it.
You think that your silence on certain topics, perhaps in the face of injustice, or unkindness, or mean-spiritedness, causes others to reserve judgement of you. Far otherwise; your silence utters very loud: you have no oracle to speak, no wisdom to offer, and your fellow people have learned that you cannot help them. Doth not wisdom cry, and understanding put forth her voice? We would be well to do likewise.
Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.
In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends.
It is precisely because of my love for humanity that I get enraged at systems that prevent people from flourishing and being free. It’s frustrating to see my righteous anger at unjust systems misinterpreted as hatred for individuals, but it’s more frustrating to see the oppressed suffer while those maladjusted to injustice remain silent. I won’t be silent. Silence is violence.
First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out for I was not a socialist. Then they came for the Trade Unionists and I did not speak out for I was not a Trade Unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out for I was not a not a Jew. Then they came for me and there was no one left to speak for me.
Have you ever wondered what you would do during the civil rights movement? Stop wondering. It is the civil rights movement. What are you doing?
Certainly, I think there is a lot to be gained from people gathering together to show solidarity. But in a world where the institutions that we’re protesting in front of are losing their legitimacy and their power, I’m not sure that this has the impact that it once did. If we think of evil as this one person, this one big event, then we tend to want to match that with one big display of resistance. But actually, if evil is banal — a set of ordinary, mundane decisions day by day — then maybe we have to start living differently day by day.
There are times when silence becomes an accomplice to injustice.
If you are silent about your pain, they’ll kill you and say you enjoyed it.
Real love cannot be silent in the face of injustice.
It takes a village to raise a child, and it also takes a village to allow the abuse of one.
Remember: Oppression thrives off isolation. Connection is the only thing that can save you. Remember: Oppression thrives on superficiality. Honesty about your struggles is the key to your liberation. Remember: Your story can help save someone’s life. Your silence contributes to someone else’s struggle. Speak so we can all be free. Love so we all can be liberated. The moment is now. We need you.
Whether you give a man a fish or teach him how to fish, your job hasn’t changed. Your job is fish. It is not to make value judgments about whether the person is deserving of fish. It is not to criticize the person for not knowing how to fish already. And it is certainly not your job to stand around and debate the relative efficacy of fish charity vs. fish education while the person in front of you goes hungry. This person is your fellow human. Your job is fish.
And of course some maxims of law to enunciate the basic logic and truth of the same thing:
An error not resisted is approved.
He who is silent appears to consent.
Things silent are sometimes considered as expressed.
To conceal is one thing, to be silent another.
Back to idiotlandia
In this case a sniper can shoot me anytime because I had no chance to protest.
You mean because you never protested, what about someone murdering you in any number of manners which leave you without a chance to protest? LMAO, jk because nobody has a right to murder anyone but everyone has a duty to oppose injustice.
What you are saying proves you are insane.
Because of your impeccable logic I must be, why else would you call me insane, if I'm not, I must be! Lmao.
No matter how much you will try, it will not change that I just told you this... on many ocassions. I will say it again. I do not consent. There. There is no magic in this universe that can turn this statement into the opposite, no matter what you believe in.
Do you vote, or are you registered to vote? Do you have a license, permits, registrations, insurances or mortgage or credit cards? Do you use a social Security? Then you consent to all those and all their contractual obligations if you do not express that you don't consent or are under duress.
Now I can answer why I'm an anarchist : because I've objected on the record for almost 10 years now, because I have no mortgage, no driver license OR any kind of license OR permits, no insurances of any kind and no credit cards or registrations. I'm an anarchist because I pay no taxes on my property or my labor. Ask me what makes you a statist now and not an anarchist along with all the statists who talk about anarchy but still pay taxes.
This is the point you cannot get. If you believe in declaration of... whatever... it does not mean it applies to me.
I think you think the declaration of independence needs me to believe in it, but I don't need to believe in it, because what I care is the truths the declaration established, which you haven't a chance in hell at finding a contention against.
Only when I say so. Telling me what is good for me, what I should want and if I disagree, you think I don't get it and for my own good you are trying to force me through some papers signed by some stranger 300 years ago... I don't even want to hear about... all this is what makes you a statist.
Wrong answer and again with the accusations without evidence for, LMAO, morons gonna moron.
A statist is someone that pays taxes.
Why do you think a majority discriminating a minority (democracy) is civilized?
I've written about democracy being the majority deciding to eat the minority for dinner numerous times, so why the heck do you think I ever thought that democracy is OK, you Idiot with the baseless accusations?
Why involuntary participation in your opinion is better than voluntary participation?
The question is why do you believe that when you probably pay taxes, get licenses and insurances and don't challenge any of that in your life? I never was of the thought that coercion is above non-aggression.
If a stranger disagrees with the way I choose to govern myself, while not harming anyone, why should I obey the stranger's worldview?
Why should I obey your demands and pleas?
Good bye troll. You will be ignored from now on. It is my own fault I fed you, but you helped me to understand a few things and inspired a few posts. There is no point trying in some cases. A fish will never climb trees. Thanks
You're welcome? LMAO.