You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Arm chair Anarchy part 1 Taoism(briefly), Proudhon, and market socialism

in #anarchy7 years ago

personally I disagree with Proudhon and much of anarchism, but I'm happy to see this writing on Steemit. When Hivemind comes out with communities, we should have a 'united-front' group.

"I plan on doing a whole post about why the subjective theory of value(the value theory purposed by right wing libertarian thinkers) and why it isn't materially based."

Yeah, me too. I don't understand the appeal of the Austrian school or idealistic explanations of value. It explains nothing. I suppose they just don't realize that.

Sort:  

Oh i'm not a mutualist, I just wanted to do a blog series about the different factions in anarchism and economic topics.

There are parts of mutualism that I think make sense and there are parts that I don't like.

My main concern when writing this post was to have anarcho-capitalist see where anarchism comes from and maybe get what historical anarchism is all about. the majority of the anarchist tag is caps so I thought I'd try and get some actual historical perspective in there, maybe weasel in some dialectics while i'm at it.

I consider myself an Eco-Anarchist actually.

I'll definitely support a united-front type group, solidarity, always.

"I don't understand the appeal of the Austrian school or idealistic explanations of value. It explains nothing. I suppose they just don't realize that."

Seriously, in the first chapter of capital Marx addresses why value isn't subjective, and why it may seem that way upon a very superficial examination. There is so much data supporting the labor theory of value that the Austrian school is just pseudoscience at this point.

"Maybe weasel in some dialectics while i'm at it."

There's a term I haven't seen on Steemit yet. I like you