As it clearly states in his Bio, Binswanger is an Objectivist using Ayn Rand's epistemology and her definition of government, rights, force, values, economics etc. There is a long tradition of disagreement between Objectivists and Anarchists which revolve around how Libertarians carelessly throw around words and deduce castles from premises that start in the clouds. There is a lot of that in your post.
http://www.checkyourpremises.org/2016/03/09/whats-wrong-with-the-concept-libertarian/
Are you accusing me of carelessly throwing around words, or are you simply trying to imply that without actually stating it? Why don't you try and justify the premise that I am careless with my words? I'm not going to hold my breath.
To respond to your link, since your post carefully avoids making any arguments to support its claims, this is a standard issue debate over the best definition of words. I do not care what words you assign to what cognitive categories; I only care that when we communicate, we understand what cognitive categories the other references with certain words, which is why I defined my terms at the very beginning.
Either respond to my argument when commenting on my post, or go make your own post.