i see you've made your obligatory comment. again though, the point of the article is... it's not about kokesh. it's about the message and the plan. :)
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
i see you've made your obligatory comment. again though, the point of the article is... it's not about kokesh. it's about the message and the plan. :)
The message and the plan are not in line with voluntaryist principle. Addressed that in the comment. Why you don’t care is perplexing to me.
i think we are just miscommunicating somehow. Nothing is more voluntaryist than decentralization.
How about asking homesteaders to supply fingerprints?
Or instead of allowing decentralized, local markets to decide what to do with the resources they use, having a centralized cabinet of “custodians,” and not the market, do it.
How about the fact that Adam has said the election (a federal, majority vote) will grant him authority?
This is all on record, man.
Does this sound very “decentralized” and voluntaryist to you?
...