We don't deny the real history. You obviously haven't been following the debates in our circles over how to return stolen land and offer restitution to those who have been plundered. I took land from no one. The State is the thief. We need to cast it off before we can begin any kind of restoration and negotiation to sort out the mess it left. But you seem to reject property, so how can you claim something has been stolen?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
You shouldn't think that I am personally aware of your entire biography. You should present those ideas when you argue.
When you occupy a location and prevent others from accessing it via force, then it's stolen. And again, there's a difference between historical significance and ideals for the future. We had property, it was stolen. We need to address that before we get rid of property.